GREEN SYSTEMS SOLAR SOLUTIONS


Stranded heat recovery using software controls


BY BRISTOL STICKNEY CONTRIBUTING WRITER O 68


ver the past 10 years or so, I have got into the habit of designing hydronic heating systems by linking all my heating sources to all my heating


loads using the principles of primary loop piping to create a “flow center” where everything is connected. This can be accomplished with site-assembled primary-secondary (P/S) components or duplicated using hydraulic flow separators and pump modules pre-fabricated “off the shelf” from manufacturers like Caleffi, PHP or Taco. In these articles I have been focusing on piping


diagrams showing P/S piping, because this is a generic way to install solar hydronic combi-systems where the flow paths are relatively easy to visualize. Figure 1 shows a typical piping configuration, similar to


dozens of combi-solar home heating systems that we have installed and commissioned in recent years. We have found that, when the piping is always done in a standard


Figure 1


We wanted to stop heating the boiler room and use the stranded heat for some practical purpose.


Case Study: Before and after improved control strategy


Figure 2 shows an example of an immediate


improvement in heating efficiency accomplished with a simple time delay. The data in Figure 2 was recorded by our SLIC control system and used to verify the success of this energy efficiency strategy. Here is the situation. When a “hot water baseboard” zone calls for heat, the boiler will typically fire to provide the high temperature fluid required by these fin tubes. The diagram in Figure 1 shows the actual piping


configuration. The boiler fluid can be preheated, either by the solar collectors directly through the heat exchanger or by the solar heat storage tank. The boiler produces the final temperature required for the baseboards, 175°F. The zone (a small bathroom) heats up quickly, and the room thermostat shuts off the call for heat. In a typical heating system, the boiler flame would stop, the boiler pump would stop and, if the solar collectors were cold, the solar pumps would stop. At this point 175°F boiler fluid is stranded in the primary loop. This situation can occur multiple times per day during the heating season. The top graph in Figure 2 shows how this stranded heat


way, the controls can be standardized as well. That way, many different installations can be controlled using the same configurations, making the final result more familiar and reliable. This allows the installers to avoid the perplexing task of acquiring custom control equipment for every job and then learning how to adjust it properly “from scratch” every time. It is better when experienced installers can focus on using standardized and familiar controls for fine-tuning to optimize the energy efficiency of each installation. For the past two years at SolarLogic we have been


developing centralized controls for solar heating combi- systems that allow the standardization and tuning for energy efficiency to advance to a whole new level. We do this with a control system that is based entirely on software and is completely interactive by remote control over the Internet. We can watch the performance of all the heating system components from day to day (or minute to minute, if needed) and “tweak” the control settings any time we see an opportunity for energy improvement. And we can do all this from the comfort and convenience of our office computer or any Internet computer that happens to be nearby. We call this system the Solar Logic Integrated Control (SLIC).


cools off over a period of hours. The wasted heat goes into overheating the boiler room; for reference, you can see the Domestic Hot Water (DHW) tank sitting there at 125°F, also losing heat very slowly to the boiler room. When we noticed this situation, we wanted to stop heating the boiler room and use the stranded heat for some practical purpose.


e Turn to SOLAR SOLUTIONS on p 70 Figure 2


phc january 2011 www.phcnews.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88