This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
By the Numbers John Zogby

Polling’s Future L

et me reiterate a prediction I have made previously: The 2012 election will be the last in which polling will rely on surveying

landline phones. Today, according to Pew Research, “fully a quar- ter of the U.S. adult population now [relies] solely on cell phone service.” Pew has also found that those most likely to fall into that group are young, African-American or Hispanic. Polling cell phone users is problematic for practical, economic and le- gal reasons. At Zogby International we believe the future of polling lies with the Internet and establishing on- line panels both large and diverse enough to give reliable samples and results. We began interactive polling 12 years ago on an experimental basis and with due diligence began offering it to private cli- ents and for our own uses to measure political at- titudes and voter preferences. Today, I can say with great confidence that our ability to use our online panel in national surveys is just as reliable as landline phone polling, and that it will soon emerge as more reliable. Look at the numbers. Here are the averages for all polling firms as compiled by and Real Clear Politics (RCP) in early July for three of the standard measures of political opinion: presi- dential approval rating, generic congressional bal- lot and nation’s direction right or wrong. With these are results from the Zogby Interactive survey taken most closely to that time (June 28). Presidential approval average:

45.2 percent, RCP 46.3 percent, Zogby Interactive 46.3 percent. Congressional generic:, Republi- cans lead, 44.2 percent to 42.8 percent; RCP, Re- publicans lead, 43.8 percent to 42.8 percent; Zogby Interactive, Republicans lead, 42.5 percent to 41 percent.

National direction: Pollster, right 31.1 percent, wrong 60.9 percent; RCP,

wrong 62.2 percent; Zogby Interactive, right 28.9 percent, wrong 59.5 percent. National horserace interactive polling we did in 2008 showed the same ability to match up with results from phone polling. Our last such poll in 2008 was on Oct. 4, and it showed Barack Obama with a 48 percent to 44 percent lead over John McCain, which was well within the margin of er- ror of telephone polls taken at the same time.

right 31.2 percent,

Interactive polling in states has also been suc-

cessful, but not as much as in national polls. In 2006, our interactive polls accurately predicted the winner in 17 of 18 U.S. Senate races. We went out on a limb in 2008 and ran interac-

tive polls in a number of presidential battleground states, again concluding these several weeks before the election. For most, our results were within the margin of error of the averages from landline polls. The demographics and size of some states make

interactive polling more problematic. We do not have sufficient sample size within our panel in some states, and others have a population diversity that makes it more difficult to achieve a representa- tive sample. However, these

are temporary problems. As

other polling companies will learn as they enter the field of interactive polling, building a large and representative sample that can reliably poll states and other population sub-sets takes time and ef- fort. Right now, reaching that goal is among our company’s highest priorities. We are confident it will be achieved. As we have journeyed into the new world of

interactive polling, our company and I have taken a number of potshots. The greatest misunderstand- ing has been about our methodology. As I have re- ported here previously, our samples are randomly drawn from a pool of several hundred thousand potential respondents. Survey respondents are in- vited to take a particular survey, very much like telephone poll respondents are called and asked to participate. A random probability sample of our representative panel receives email invitations to participate, with a link taking them to the sur- vey on Zogby’s secure servers. Respondents never know when they are going to get an invitation to take part in a survey, and they never know what the subject matter is going to be until they click on the invitation link. The move into interactive polling has been well

worth it, despite the criticisms. Others will inevita- bly follow, and my fondest hope is that together as political and social scientists, we will carry on the valuable job of measuring public opinion.

John Zogby is president and CEO of the polling firm Zogby International. You can post comments on political topics in the Zogby Forums at

December 2010 | Campaigns & Elections 73

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79