Park News
www.parkworld-online.com
ParkBloggin’ by Dennis Speigel
‘It’s all about discounting and earnings’
As I look at our industry and the large corporations that now dominate ownership, one thing comes clearly through: “It’s all about earnings.” That is not a bad thing, but make no mistake, this is the driving force that charts the course for public companies. As I write this, Walt Disney World has just raised its prices to US$82 per park. For first time the $80 barrier has been broken. Every time Disney increases, the other major Florida attractions follow within two weeks, and sure enough Universal Orlando now has. In these difficult recessionary times why would parks increase prices? Simple, to increase revenues and earnings. Admission prices are the one area where attractions can dictate internal income. There is a risk associated with price increases and that is that people pull back and don’t visit. Remember all pricing packages increase when the “rack rate” single day admission price increases. So the visitor pays the price, whatever ticket they buy. Yes they do! With 2010 attendance flat, or up a little at best, and in-park spending flat or down, parks have to increase prices where they can, and that is at the front gate. They have to increase earnings.
In the not too distant future we will see a $100 front gate admission at a theme park. Most likely it will be Disney that sets that milestone admission. It is inevitable. It will happen.
As basic admission prices rise, I believe parks must look for “price value” related alternatives and options to provide stimulation to the visitors – daytime, nighttime, weekday and weekend options that create value and impulse to visit.
The season pass concept has been good and bad for our industry. It has greatly eroded a la carte tickets, all but eradicating those that pay full price. Two generations ago Six Flags management was seriously negligent with its deep discounting. A flawed business plan attempted to “roll up” the industry by buying smaller independent parks, but resulted in the ultimate bankruptcy of this once iconic regional operator. To try to dig itself out of a hole, management discounted in a way that seriously affected revenues and the overall product. Unfortunately a lot of other operators adopted this same flawed
Harrison ‘Buzz’ Price 1921-2010
Harrison “Buzz” Price, the research economist who conducted thousands of feasibility studies for theme parks, museums and zoos – including Disneyland – passed away on August 15 at the age of 89. Price, an engineering graduate of California Institute of Technology, joined Stanford
Research Institute after receiving his masters in Business Administration from Stanford University. He became recognised as the pioneer in the field of theme parks, resort and leisure-recreation project feasibility almost from the day in 1953 that Walt and Roy O Disney chose him “to determine the economic feasibility of the best location for a new project.” That project was, of course, Disneyland in California. Encouraged by Walt, Price formed Economics Research Associates (ERA) in 1958. Ultimately, he conducted 150 studies for the Walt Disney Company,
SEPTEMBER 2010 Caption
approach and fell into the same trap – loss of revenue. If you look at two of the largest regional operators in the United States, Six Flags and Cedar Fair, you see one company emerging from bankruptcy and the other restructuring its debt and balance sheet. Why? Six Flags is digging out from that flawed business plan, where it overpaid for the parks it purchased. Cedar Fair encountered the same problem by paying 11.3 times EBITDA for Paramount Parks. The group received parks in better markets and in better condition than Six Flags during its roll up period, but nevertheless it overpaid and this seriously affected Cedar Fair’s balance sheet.
In the United States we operate in a mature industry cycle, market penetration has reached the maximum level. That makes it more difficult to grow attendance at existing parks. It puts pressure on retaining attendance. That too creates more discounting, extended discounting and deeper discounting.
Discounting is a serious issue that the entire industry is going to have to address in the near future. Discounting is cancerous and contagious. Once you “get on the junk” it is hard to get off. We are finding that the consumer waits and looks for the discounts. Many times visitors will call parks inquiring as to when certain discounts will be offered. As cancerous as it is, discounting is here to stay in some form. Hopefully it can be better managed by parks in the future as they choose “price values” options rather than monetary discounts.
“
Over 340 million people visited attractions in 2009. That number will increase in 2010. But will earnings?
Dennis Speigel is president of International Theme Park Services (ITPS), based in Cincinnati, Ohio. ITPS is the industry’s leading, independent management/consulting firm, offering services including feasibility analysis, design/masterplanning, pre-opening operational planning, on-site management, sponsorship & marketing, executive search and business audits.
www.interthemepark.com
In the not
too distant future we will see a $100 front gate admission at a theme park. Most likely it will be Disney that sets that milestone. It is inevitable. It will happen
including site and feasibility analysis for Walt Disney World in Florida and Tokyo Disneyland, plus over 3,000 projects for other clients. “Buzz was the father of our industry of economic consulting,” notes Ray Braun, entertainment practice leader for AECOM Economics (formerly ERA). After selling ERA in 1969, most of Price’s projects were under the aegis of his own Harrison Price Company, including studies for eight World’s Fairs, Sea World, Knott’s Berry Farm, Universal Studios, Six Flags, numerous museums, zoos and many international projects Born May 17, 1921 in Oregon City, Oregon, Buzz Price grew up in Southern California, marrying Anne Shaw in 1944. Buzz is survived Anne, four children, nine grandchildren, two great grandchildren and a sister.
7
“
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40