Putting the ‘Smart’ into Smart Grid
With climate change right at the top of the political agenda, governments across Europe are introducing radical compulsory emission reduction targets. In the UK alone, carbon emissions must be slashed from 1990 levels by 34% by 2020, and by at least 80% by 2050.
By Eugen Mayer
UK’s energy industry struggling with rising prices, fuel poverty, growing exposure to a volatile global gas market and a raft of rapidly expiring power stations, never have governments been under more pressure to back new clean technologies, improve energy efficiency and reduce consumption. As part of the drive to meet its legally binding targets, the UK
A
is moving towards a smart grid model for its energy market. The smart grid is a simple idea: an intelligent power generation and distribution system that automatically balances and controls supply and demand to make maximum use of energy at minimal cost. But while the idea of the smart grid is simple, there are significant challenges when it comes to implementation and impact. It will drive a fundamental change in the way we all consume energy and this starts with smart meters. As the communication channel between suppliers and consumers, smart meters transmit and receive detailed data on energy use. This two-way exchange of information means that consumers can play a far more active role in the supply chain, taking greater control over their energy consumption, carbon emissions and energy costs. While the shape of the final model for smart metering
remains unclear, it will certainly need to be underpinned by a solid communications network – something that is sorely lacking at the moment. Smart meters can only provide their intelligent functionality if they are supported by a seamless communications structure that provides bi-directional transmission of consumption and control data in real-time. Broadband Powerline (BPL) technology does exactly that. BPL, already widely deployed in
recent study by UK electricity regulator OFGEM suggested that an investment of up to £200 bn is required to hit environmental targets and to secure supply.1
With the As well as relatively low set-up costs, a BPL-enabled smart
grid has some clear advantages for the consumer in terms of savings. Remote metering will give them a very detailed, real- time view of their actual power consumption. BPL will provide the technology to enable suppliers to introduce more flexible, lower-cost tariffs at non-peak times. Access to this broader range of tariffs should also encourage consumers to reduce their peak-time consumption, reducing the need for extra plants to cope with this peak demand. These same carbon- belching plants could then be replaced by cleaner sources of renewable energy such as wind power. Crucially, BPL is not a static technology: its use of Internet
Protocol means that a wide variety of additional smart grid applications can be implemented step by step, as they become available. In the future, intelligent power networks could also be used for load management through automatic, time-of-day and load-dependent adjustment of user appliances such as freezers or dishwashers. Besides the consumer, there is one other group that could
be a key beneficiary of BPL. The advent of smart metering will also support the creation of new and profitable revenue streams by the owners of the electricity networks themselves, the distribution network operators (DNOs). The UK network is owned by a small number of DNOs – such
as Scottish Power and EDF – who are licensed to distribute electricity in their own particular region. As the UK moves towards wide-scale adoption of smart meters, DNOs are in a prime position to capitalise on the benefits of BPL. With just eight DNOs, the structure of the UK market is
Smart meters can only provide their intelligent functionality if
Germany, turns existing electricity grids into an Internet protocol- based communication platform. Every power line becomes a broadband data interface and power grids turn into intelligent systems, connecting to meters in homes and businesses. Because BPL uses the existing power networks, gearing up
the grid for the technology is comparatively straightforward. It eliminates the need for additional networks, support services or third-party approvals, and significantly reduces investment costs. Furthermore, as a ‘plug-and-play’ solution, BPL can work instantly with any meter from any vendor.
worldPower 2010
they are supported by a seamless communications structure
currently very flat compared to markets like Germany, which has as many as 800. And as the network owners, they have a direct connection to every meter in the UK. A partnership between the
DNOs and BPL communications providers would be an important
step towards reducing the UK’s carbon footprint by supporting the integration of renewable energies. Altruism apart, it could also generate significant benefits for the DNOs themselves, enabling them to generate new revenue streams if they have the strategic vision to grasp the opportunity to make the most of this and take the money before other people catch on. In addition to these new revenue streams, DNOs can also benefit from other applications opened up by this, such as power quality measurements and other network monitoring.
111
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148