TURKISH TRADEMARK LAW
JURISDICTION REPORT: TURKEY
FILLING THE GAPS IN
Isik Ozdogan and Ezgi Baklaci
Moroglu Arseven Law Firm
Although Turkey has followed international developments and harmonised its Trademark Law with EU legislation, the registration of non-traditional marks such as product packaging and product shape has not fallen into place. Te Turkish Appeal Court has recently approved the First Instance Court’s cancellation decision of the Turkish Patent Institute’s (TPI’s) refusal of BP’s application to register green service station trade dress.
The TPI’s decision
BP filed an application to expand the protection of the green service station appearance registered before WIPO in class 37. Te TPI refused the application on the grounds that the sign does not conform to the provision of Article 5 of Decree Law No. 556, which defines what constitutes a registrable trademark. A trademark can be registered if it is capable of distinguishing the goods and services of one undertaking from the goods and services of other undertakings, and may consist of all kinds of graphic signs capable of being published within the scope of Article 5.
Although BP appealed against the refusal decision, it was upheld by the TPI's re-examination and evaluation board. BP initiated a cancellation action in response to the decision.
The First Instance Court’s decision
In its cancellation judgment, the First Instance Court first discussed whether the refused sign can be considered within the scope of Article 5. Te court stated that, unlike the Design Law, the Trademark Law does not require a sign to be genuine nor does it consider the creativity of a sign. Terefore, a sign should be distinctive in order to be protected by registration. Within the scope of this information, the court found that green service station as a whole could be registered, as its colour composition was capable of distinguishing the services in class 37 from other services offered by other undertakings because the sign depicts contours and does not indicate or prominently display the features of the services in class 37.
Although the TPI refused the subject application only on the grounds that it cannot be registered as a trademark, the court also examined the TPI’s decision according to the absolute grounds for refusal specified in Articles 7/1-c, d and e of the Decree Law No. 556, covering marks that serve to indicate the necessary elements to the trade.
Te court stated that the green service station trademark is not recognised by consumers and has a genuine look with its colour composition and configuration. Te sign does more than just indicate the services covered in class 37, and consumers would not be able imagine the services that will be served under this trademark. Te court also discussed whether
www.worldipreview.com
“THE TPI ACCEPTS TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS CONSISTING OF PACKAGES, PACKAGE LABELS AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES.’’
the subject sign has a special configuration or shape that has to be used in the sector. If the subject sign has to be used in the sector, its registration would affect competition. However, the court stated that the green service station trademark does not contain the shape of the product that results from the nature of the good or that gives substantial value to the good as there is no existing trademark in class 37 with this configuration and colour composition. Te court also found that there are lots of signs available as trademarks in class 37.
Te court further noted that the trademark would not be likely to cause confusion for the average consumer. Te average consumer would not prefer the applicant’s services over a rival’s merely because its service station appearance is covered by its trademark.
Moreover, it noted that the registration of the subject application in the UK, at WIPO and in most of the designated countries constitutes a presumption that the green service station is distinctive.
Consequently, the First Instance Court cancelled the TPI’s refusal decision. Te First Instance Court’s decision was approved by the Appeal Court, and the decision was finalised in December 2009.
Review of the decision
As stated above, the TPI accepts trademark applications consisting of packages, package labels and three-dimensional shapes. With the decision of the Appeal Court, the practice regarding the registration of trademarks including exterior buildings’ appearance seems to be settled too. Terefore, we are of the opinion that the TPI will accept trademark applications consisting of fuel filling stations’ exterior appearance applications in different colours/colour combinations if they do not have exactly the same appearance as BP’s filling station.
iozdogan@morogluarseven.av.tr
ebaklaci@morogluarseven.av.tr
World Intellectual Property Review March/April 2010
55
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76