ACCELERATED EXAMINATION

In addition, applicants must provide a translation in Chinese of the claims allowed in the foreign application. If the foreign claims differ from those pending in the Taiwan application, TIPO also requires the applicant to submit a clarification of the differences.

In addition to the aforementioned documents, the applicant may also submit any responses, amendments and relevant filings made in the foreign application that can facilitate the examination in Taiwan.

Once the request form and all requisite documents have been duly filed, TIPO will issue a notice of rejection or final decision in the Taiwan application within six months.

Notice of rejection

If the counterpart foreign application is in a more advanced stage of examination, the applicant can also request accelerated examination in Taiwan, based on at least a first notice of rejection and the relevant search report issued in the counterpart foreign application.

In addition to the examination opinion and search report, a Chinese translation of the claims subjected to examination in the foreign application is also required. If the claims rejected in the foreign application differ from the claims currently pending in the Taiwan application, the applicant must also clarify the differences between the claims.

It is worth noting that under this second scenario, the current AEP only accepts requests that are based on examination opinions issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the European Patent Office (EPO) and the Japan Patent Office (JPO). International preliminary examination reports, even if conducted by any of these foreign patent offices, are not accepted.

Moreover, if the notice of rejection issued in the foreign application includes prior art references that are detrimental to the novelty and/or inventive step requirements, the applicant must indicate the reasons why the claims pending in the Taiwan application are clearly distinguishable from these prior art references.

Aſter the request form and all requisite documents are filed, the AEP prescribes a period of six months for TIPO to issue a notice of rejection or final decision on the Taiwan application.

Need for commercial practice

In addition to the aforementioned scenarios, the applicant for an invention patent in Taiwan can also request accelerated examination should the

24 World Intellectual Property Review March/April 2010

applied for patent be necessary for commercial practice. In this case, there is no need for the examination opinions of counterpart foreign applications. Instead, the applicant should submit documents that demonstrate the commercial practice, such as licensing contracts, advertisement catalogues and photographs of commercial embodiments covered by the Taiwan application.

It is worth noting that Article 39 of the Taiwan Patent Act already permits an applicant to request “preferential examination” if the subject matter of the applicant’s patent is in use by a third party. Te AEP differs from the provision of Article 39 in that it allows applicants to request an accelerated examination when the patented

subject matter is practised by the applicant himself, rather than by a third party.

Because no examination opinion discussing patentability issues is required, the AEP sets forth a longer period of nine months for TIPO to issue a notice of rejection or final decision under this third scenario.

Requesting accelerated examination

Te applicant can file a request for accelerated examination only aſter TIPO has issued the notice of entry in the examination stage or the notice of entry in the continued examination stage (i.e. the application goes for another round of examination with another examiner aſter having been rejected in a first round). Tis time frame applies regardless of whether the request is filed under any of the three scenarios discussed above.

Provided that it complies with the above timing and includes all the requisite documents, the AEP does not restrict the number of requests that can be filed, for example, when submitting updated examination opinions made by foreign patent offices. Moreover, a request can be filed even when a notice of rejection is pending in the Taiwan application. In this case, as well as the necessary filings for the request, the applicant still has to submit a substantive response that addresses the issues raised in the pending notice of rejection.

Analysis

“ THE AEP MAY BE PARTICULARLY VALUABLE FOR APPLICANTS WHO WANT TO DRAW TAIWAN APPLICATIONS INTO A FASTER EXAMINATION TRACK AS SOON AS FAVOURABLE EXAMINATION RESULTS ARE AVAILABLE IN COUNTERPART FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS.”

Compared to other current PPH programmes, the AEP adopts a more open approach, which allows the applicant to use the fast examination track anytime aſter entry into the examination stage, even aſter a first notice of rejection is issued in the Taiwan application. As a result, the AEP may be particularly valuable for applicants who want to draw Taiwan applications into a faster examination track as soon as favourable examination results are available in counterpart foreign applications.

Another distinctive feature of the AEP is the ability to request fast examination for commercial purposes. Tis option should be of particular interest to companies in fast-moving technologies or involved in cross-licensing negotiations, particularly agreements involving large numbers of patents and products.

Nevertheless, certain aspects still need further work. For example, while allowance in any counterpart foreign applications can be relied on to trigger accelerated examination in the Taiwan application, only work generated from a few patent offices is actually permissible if the counterpart foreign application is still pending.

www.worldipreview.com Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76