NEW RULES FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
JURISDICTION REPORT: MEXICO
Eugenio Ruiz
Becerril, Coca & Becerril, S.C.
Article 181 of the Mexican Law of Industrial Property (MLIP) establishes that when a trademark application is filed by a legal representative, the legal capacity of the latter must be proved through a power of attorney signed by the applicant.
Recently, an amendment to Article 181 was enacted, allowing the possibility of filing a trademark application without a power of attorney. Te only requirement is a statement under oath by the person filing the application that they are the legal representative of the applicant.
Te rationale for the amendment is that, under the MLIP, the validity of a trademark registration cannot be challenged on the grounds that the legal capacity of a representative was not properly proven. Terefore, it doesn’t make sense to prevent someone from filing a trademark application on behalf of a third party in a bona fide manner, by stating under oath that they are its legal representative.
Te amendment will also speed up the filing process by removing the need to obtain a power of attorney. Tis will particularly benefit foreign applicants, since they will not need to carry out this time-consuming action that sometimes delays the filing process. Consequently, it will save the costs of late document filings.
Tis will also save the costs of filing responses to official actions, which only request a missing power of attorney or seek to obtain missing information from an incomplete power of attorney filed as a formal filing requirement. Tis should also contribute to a better and faster examination of a trademark application at the trademark office.
Tough these are clear benefits to the amendment, there is also a downside that could have been foreseen.
Te amendment states that only one person can represent the applicant by taking an oath. Tus, the person who signs the application papers and states under oath that they are the legal representative will be the only legal representative under oath, and therefore, the only one allowed to sign further writs during prosecution and any other writs aſter registration is achieved. Tis means that any other person who needs to sign as a legal representative of the applicant apart from the one who signed the application papers in the beginning would need to prove their legal capacity with a power of attorney.
Under the above scenario, if the person who signed the application papers as the legal representative under oath could not sign any writ for any reason by a given deadline, another person would be required to do it and to prove their legal capacity through a power of attorney. Tis would lead to the exact situation the amendment is designed to prevent.
48 World Intellectual Property Review March/April 2010
“THE AMENDMENT STATES THAT ONLY ONE PERSON CAN REPRESENT THE APPLICANT BY TAKING AN OATH. THUS, THE PERSON WHO SIGNS THE APPLICATION PAPERS AND STATES UNDER OATH THAT THEY ARE THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE WILL BE THE ONLY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE UNDER OATH, AND THEREFORE, THE ONLY ONE ALLOWED TO SIGN FURTHER WRITS DURING PROSECUTION AND ANY OTHER WRITS AFTER REGISTRATION IS ACHIEVED.’’
Terefore, while the amendment provides certain benefits, it is our opinion that it should be revised to allow more than one person to be able to state under oath that they are the legal representative of an applicant.
eruiz@bcb.com.mx
www.worldipreview.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76