INVESTMENT IN INDIA
required to the Current Account Transaction Rules in order to synchronise them with the press note and, ultimately, the government’s liberalisation policy.
“ THE GOVERNMENT HAS SIGNIFICANTLY LIBERALISED THE REGIME FOR FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY AGREEMENTS AND TRADEMARK LICENSING AGREEMENTS, WHICH IS SURELY A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.”
Further clarity on the procedures for the payment of lump sums and royalties will be forthcoming when the government decides on the post- reporting system for technology transfer and collaborations, and licensing of trademarks and brand names, as promised by the press note.
Boost to foreign investment
Tis development will potentially not only boost technology transfer to India but also act as an incentive for foreign entities to enter the Indian market. Tis will be further assisted by the provisions of a 2003 press note, which permitted the issuance of equity shares in lieu of the payment of lump sum fees and royalty payments..
Royalties were calculated using the net ex-factory sale price of the product, exclusive of excise duties, minus the cost of standard and imported components, irrespective of the source of procurement, including ocean freight, insurance and customs duties.
Similarly, licensing agreements for the use of trademarks and brand names could be entered into without prior government approval if the royalties payable did not exceed two percent for exports and one percent for domestic sales.
Any payment associated with a technology transfer or licensing arrangement that exceeded these limits required government approval.
Step towards liberalisation
However, a DIPP press note dated December 2009 heralded a radical departure from this position by permitting technology transfer and licensing agreements to be entered into without prior government approval, regardless of the value of the lump sum fees or royalties involved.
It is interesting to note that although the press note unambiguously stated that royalty and lump sum payments for technical collaboration and use of a trademark would no longer be subject to the earlier limits, it also noted that such payments would be subject to the Current Account Transaction Rules, which still maintain the prior limits. Since a press note has the force of law, a statutory amendment is
Prior to the 2009 press note, the issuance of shares in lieu of royalty or lump sum payments above the stated limits required government approval. But since the recent press note removed these limits, shares can now be issued in lieu of royalty or lump sum payments without prior government approval. However, the sectoral limits for FDI in India remain applicable and investments beyond these limits continue to require approval in the relevant sectors. In the telecommunications sector, for example, companies engaged in providing unified access services and national/international long distance services may receive foreign investment of up to 74 percent of the total share capital, as can Internet service providers, with gateways, radio paging and provision of end-to-end bandwidth, out of which up to 49 percent can be sourced without prior government approval.
On a critical note, now that royalty payments are outside the purview of government regulation and will be determined through negotiation between the parties involved, it may compromise the bargaining position of an Indian subsidiary against its multinational parent. For example, a parent company could charge its Indian subsidiary excessive royalties, which could adversely affect the interests of the subsidiary’s minority shareholders.
In conclusion, the government has significantly liberalised the regime for foreign technology agreements and trademark licensing arrangements, which is surely a step in the right direction, leading to growth of the Indian market and making Indian companies more competitive. Tat said, the true impact of the change—both on procedural matters and collaboration efforts—is not yet known.
28 World Intellectual Property Review March/April 2010
Nirupam Lodha
Nirupam Lodha has been an associate with Luthra & Luthra Law Offices in New Delhi, since obtaining a BSc LLB degree (with Hons. in Law and Technology) from National Law University, Jodhpur in 2007. Lodha’s work history includes transactional and advisory works involving information technology, intellectual property law, etc. He has also been involved in draſting and negotiating intellectual property licensing and technology transfer agreements as well as technology litigations, including those involving patents and multijurisdictional claims.
nlodha@luthra.com
kshitijs@luthra.com
Kshitij Sharma
Kshitij Sharma is an associate in the IP law team at Luthra & Luthra Law Offices, in New Delhi. He graduated from National Law University, Jodhpur, with a specialisation in law and technology. He specialises in negotiating and structuring the development, licensing and transfer of intellectual property and technology. He also actively advises clients on acquisition/licensing and sale of patents in order to reduce risk and improve strategic patent portfolio management.
www.worldipreview.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76