search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ON THE JOB OFFICER SAFETY JUST HANDED DOWN PUBLIC SAFETY IT SOLUTIONS


Why People Don’t Report Suspicious Behavior


Why refuse or rationalize away the call? By J.T. McBride I Guest Commentator


esanow@hendonpub.com Lt. Ed Sanow


targeted mass-shooting or terror-related incident occurs, investigators often discover people who had an awareness of the perpetrator’s intentions or potentially dangerous behavior prior to the attack. Given all of the publicity as- sociated with mass-casualty incidents since 2001, why are people so reluctant to report unusual behavior to the police? There appear to be at least seven primary reasons why citi-


F


zens don’t report suspicious activity until it is too late to pre- vent an attack. First, some people simply don’t realize that what they have witnessed might be a harbinger of future violence. The behavior captures their attention, registers on their scale of ‘unusual,’ and gets stored in their brains. After pondering whatever it was they saw or heard, they classify it as benign and unworthy of further attention. Once the incident occurs, however, they readily tell reporters and/or the police and often regret their decision to ignore the matter. Second, some citizens live in areas of town where ‘bi-


zarre’ behavior may actually be the norm. For them, the behavior would have to reach fairly high levels of ‘unusu- alness in order for them to make a phone call and report the activity in question. In the third category, we find individu- als who simply can’t afford to get involved with the police, no matter what the reason. People involved in illegal be- havior, wanted by the police, or who hate the police are not going to call 9-1-1 to report suspicious activity. Those in the fourth group are fearful of being labeled a


‘snitch’ by their friends and neighbors. In some cultures, reporting problems to the authorities is simply unaccept- able and anyone who elects to do so would be quickly os- tracized by family, friends, and neighbors. The fi fth group is populated by individuals who refuse because of fear. Some refuse to report to avoid being targeted by a law-


or more than a dozen years, public offi cials have been encouraging American citizens to report suspicious activity to the local police. Yet, when a


suit. Others fear retaliation by those engaged in the suspicious behavior, especially when they are reputed gangsters, terrorists, violent criminals, or ‘street people’ who have earned a reputation for being dangerous. Unfortunately, protection offered by local and state police, in return for cooperation, is only temporary. After the case is over, witnesses are on their own unless an individual can earn his/her way into the federal witness protection program where the likelihood of retaliation is rare. The sixth group of people includes those who refuse to get in-


volved in others’ business or who don’t see any obligation to con- tribute in any way to public safety. I recall one citizen encountered many years ago who exemplifi ed this type of attitude. “It’s not my responsibility. That’s why we pay you cops the big bucks!” Whatever happened to the concepts of moral obligation (duty) and shared responsibility for the common good? Perhaps the so- cial ‘transformation’ we’ve undergone in recent years has killed off some key values worthy of retention? That thought brings us to the last group of people, which includes those who fear being called ‘politically incorrect’ for reporting suspicious behavior on the part of individuals unlike themselves. Terrorist and targeting shooters rely upon these non-re- porting motivations and may understand them better than most of us involved in counter-terrorism, crime preven- tion, and homeland security. We can’t effectively motivate people to report unusual activity unless we better under- stand why they readily ignore appeals to do so. The need to spend more dollars on neuro-psychological research relat- ing to crime, violence, and terrorism has never been more apparent than it has become lately.


Chief J.T. McBride, M.P.A., C.L.E.E., teaches at Lakeland Community College (Ohio), is the co-author of K-PhD School and Campus Shootings Awareness and is a regular contributor to LAW and ORDER. He may be reached at chiefjtm@aol.com.


LaO Post your comments on this story by visiting www.lawandordermag.com


“Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown.” — Henry IV, William Shakespeare 6 LAW and ORDER I April 2016


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68