search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEWS


Steering Group on Competence for Building a Safer Future


Competence Steering Group launches interim report


THE GROUP (CSG) has launched a summary and reports from working groups created after the Hackitt Review, which includes ‘sweeping proposals to raise competence and make buildings safer’. The Construction Industry Council (CIC) noted that the ‘radical and wide- ranging’ measures aim to improve competence in design, construction, inspection, maintenance and operation of high risk residential buildings (HRRBs). The cross industry group is backed by the government, the Industry Safety Steering Group and Dame Judith Hackitt. The CSG, set up by the Industry Response Group (IRG) to ‘tackle competency failings’ identified by Dame Judith, has brought together over 150 institutions and associations across the ‘full spectrum’ of construction, built environment, fire safety and building owner and management sectors to work ‘towards the common purpose of raising competences to improve life safety’. The report urged that ‘all life-safety-


critical’ disciplines working on HRRBs – including designers, engineers, building standards officers, site supervisors, fire safety enforcement officers and fire risk officials – ‘adopt the measures’, and called on the government to ‘play its part’ by requiring any company or individual working on a central government construction project to ‘meet the competence frameworks set out’. Such projects include retrofitting


existing HRRBs, with local authorities and wider public and private sectors ‘urged to follow suit’. Dame Judith identified a ‘lack of consistency and rigour’ in processes and standards for assuring skills, knowledge and behaviour of individuals and organisations working on HRRBs, concluding that this was a ‘major flaw’ in the current regulatory system. Competence frameworks which


the report developed ‘tackle these shortcomings’ through setting out the ‘appropriate knowledge, qualifications and skill sets’ required for those working on HRRBs, as well as ‘how they should be assessed and by whom’. The report also called for


RAISING THE BAR INTERIM REPORT


Improving Competence Building a Safer Future


a new oversight body – the Building Safety Competence Committee (BSCC) – to monitor assessment processes, ‘draw up’ a central dutyholder register of those eligible to work on HRRBs, and to ‘continually drive improvements’. It also recommended that the


government ‘mandate’ individuals working on HRRBs to be ‘registered/ certified’ by a recognised professional or certified body, while all organisations – including professional bodies – that carry out competency assessments should ‘themselves be subject to a rigorous system of oversight’. This could be undertaken by


an organisation such as UKAS or the Engineering Council, while the building safety regulator has been asked to ‘hold and maintain’ a register of qualified individuals with the advice of the BSCC, alongside providing ‘sign-posting’ to registers held by professional and trade bodies ‘of those qualified and competent’ to work on HRRBs. A reassessment period of ‘no less than five years’ should be implemented, the report notes. Also, the report advises that the ‘common principles’ of continuing professional development (CPD) should be established for each sector, which the BSCC can use to ‘hold sectors to account’, and that fire safety CPD materials should explain ‘basic fire science’ and be made available to anyone working on


10 OCTOBER 2019 www.frmjournal.com


HRRBs or managing occupied HRRBs. A consultation on the report is open, and will end on 18 October, after which a final report will be issued. Graham Watts, chief executive of the Construction Industry Council and chairman of the CSG, said: ‘It is clear that industry organisations have accepted the need to change. The working groups are proposing to raise the bar through a more rigorous approach, including training, assessment, reassessment and third-party accreditation. Combined with a new oversight layer, we think adopting our measures will result in a paradigm change to improve competence and industry culture.’ BAFE commented: ‘BAFE


August 2019 © Construction Industry Council II


welcomes the publication of Raising the Bar, the summary and reports from the Working Groups established after the Hackitt Review following the Grenfell Tower fire tragedy. We have contributed significantly to a number of the Working Groups and supported the Fire Sector Federation with the work of the [CSG], which has brought this work together. ‘The ongoing need for


competence and third party certification of contractors for fire protection is a priority from this report. We will be working with all relevant bodies to ensure that statutory bodies develop their requirements to bring about a change in the culture of specification and procurement to properly reflect the need for competent providers.’


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60