search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FOCUS


Fire service measures


Figures 4 and 5 (top two), 6 and 7.1 (second two), and 7.2 and 7.3


a passage to the surface of the material and, ultimately, breach the surface. This breach will provide an air supply to the hot core gases, resulting in a fuel controlled fi re burning at the peak heat release rate for the material. This fi re behaviour has been observed in coal heaps and documented2


(see Figure 4 above).


Stacked bale fi res When baled material is stacked above 1m in height, a surface fi re that affects the vertical space between the individual pillars will generate vortices driven by the convection currents. The fl uid dynamic fl ows produced by the vortices can be suffi cient to strip any ash and char away from combustible material, and accelerate phase change in low grade plastics to a point where the process is almost instantaneous. This can result in an unusually high heat release rate for any given material within this region (see Figures 5, 6 and 7 above).


26 NOVEMBER 2018 www.frmjournal.com As the stack bindings fail, together with partial


thermal expansion of the material at the top of the stack, a section of the stack will fall and bury burning material. Stacked bales tend towards degeneration into piles in this way, and as a result, the pile of material will generally develop several buried deep seated fi res. This behaviour is occasionally mistaken for


a surface fi re burrowing into a pile. When the bales have a high plastic content by volume the fi res tend to vaporise the fuel bed, which results in a signifi cant reduction in the calving behaviours. During a test with high grade plastic HDPE bottles, the stack was observed to become unstable, which resulted in a burning bale falling off of the top of the stack. This is obviously an additional hazard for fi refi ghting. Note: the RDF tested generally had a plastics content of 30 to 40%, and this was suffi cient to suppress the fi re growth. The other materials tested contained 85 to 95% plastic,


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60