search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
carried out a prosecution, but that it has not been reported or factored in. Whether the audits and inspections carried


out by HMICFRS will impact upon FRS policies or appetites for prosecutions remains to be seen. The most relevant question asked by inspectors with regard to this was how effective the FRS was at protecting the public through regulation of fire safety. This was one of five questions asked to establish the effectiveness of FRSs at keeping people safe and secure from fire and other risks. The inspectors considered three areas in this regard: • the risk based approach • enforcement – which involved training and the issuing of prohibition and enforcement notices/prosecutions ‘working with others’


• Audit results


Not surprisingly, the findings confirmed similar disparities in enforcement practice following inspections: 22 FRSs were found to be ‘good’, 22 were found to ‘require improvement’ and three were rated as ‘inadequate’. Not one fire service was found to be ‘outstanding’ in this area. Was there any correlation between the


number of prosecutions taken and the inspector’s findings? Not really. Two of the top five authorities for taking prosecutions were found to ‘require improvement’ and one of the authorities that had


Fire and rescue service West Midlands


Greater Manchester Lancashire


Greater London North Yorkshire


Devon and Somerset Cheshire


West Yorkshire Avon


Surrey


Buckinghamshire Cumbria Derbyshire East Sussex Hampshire


Nottinghamshire Oxfordshire Merseyside


Tyne and Wear Essex County


never taken a prosecution was found to be ‘good’. Therefore, it is clear that the taking of prosecutions is not the only key performance indicator when considering the protection of the public through regulation of fire safety. There is no doubt that the press has already


shown considerable interest in the findings of the inspections, and there have already been management consequences in some authorities following publication of the results. Whether the public scrutiny of these findings and figures will impact upon policy decisions and appetites for prosecutions within FRSs remains to be seen. Even Her Majesty’s Inspectors noted that the funding of FRSs clearly impacted upon their findings. If improvements are to be made, extra funding will be required, even if the funding places FRSs in the same position as they were before budget cuts were made seven or eight years ago. What is clear from the prosecution statistics and the HMICFRS findings is that the enforcement of the FSO since 2006 has been, and is likely to remain, something of a postcode lottery


Warren Spencer is managing director and fire safety solicitor at Blackhurst Budd Solicitors. For more information, view page 3


You can view the latest statistics referenced here at https://bit.ly/2tDtQCO and the HMICFRS data at https://bit.ly/2SXFfrX


Number of FSO prosecutions 133 80 69 52 34 33 32 27 23 18 16 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 13 12


www.frmjournal.com JUNE 2020 27


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60