search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEWS Leaseholder and waking watch issues continue


CALLS HAVE been made for the government’s £1bn cladding remediation fund to cover other fire safety issues, including ‘inadequate’ compartmentation and ‘missing insulation’; while the government has been studying waking watch cost reductions after one property’s residents were asked to take over the watch.


Funding call


In March, Chancellor Rishi Sunak announced the funding during the budget to help with removing combustible cladding from both social housing and privately owned blocks. The funding adds to the original £600m funding allocated for both social housing and privately owned blocks over 18m tall, although this was for aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding.


Mr Sunak said the new funding


would ‘go beyond dealing with ACM to make sure that all unsafe combustible cladding will be removed’, but there were concerns at the time that there was a lack of clarity about whether the funding would cover fire doors and compartmentation. Inside Housing has now reported on the views shared in a survey by the Housing, Communities and Local Government (HCLG) Committee of leaseholders nationwide. This survey, which received


1,352 responses, found that 34% had ‘missing or inadequate’ compartmentation in their blocks, while another 30% had ‘combustible or missing’ insulation, which had been revealed to not be covered by the funding. In turn, 14% had issues with timber balconies and walkways, 5% had issues with ‘inadequate’ fire doors, and 27% said the funding should ‘be extended to cover all serious fire safety defects’ such as the above.


Another finding was that 70% of


respondents ‘still have dangerous cladding on their buildings and


have yet to see it removed’, while additional issues highlighted included ‘high ongoing costs caused by waking watches and increased insurance premiums’; indirect costs including properties being valued at zero by lenders; and ‘difficulties mortgaging’ properties. In its response, the HCLG


Committee said that there was an ‘ongoing lack of clarity’ for residents over the extent of fire safety issues in buildings, with many having said the cladding issue alone ‘is having a significant impact on their mental health’. Committee chair Clive Betts stated: ‘I would like to thank all those who took part in the survey. It is vital that we get an understanding of the reality of the situation for thousands across the country as we continue our work into cladding remediation. ‘What we have heard is not


encouraging and it appears that much more will need to be done if people are to feel safe in their homes, and no longer face the stress of large bills to resolve issues not of their making. The [committee] will continue to hold the government and industry to account while the issues remain widespread.’ Fire Brigades Union general


secretary Matt Wrack added: ‘The fire safety fund announced in the Budget still abandons thousands


14 JUNE 2020 www.frmjournal.com


of residents trapped in dangerous buildings below 18m and in buildings with other fire safety defects. £1bn is not enough to address the building safety crisis we are facing. The government needs to urgently conduct an open and accountable national audit of unsafe buildings, properly cost the work and set out ways to recover the cost from building owners.’


Waking watch costs


Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick started an investigation into measures’ to ‘reduce the cost’ of waking watches to residents in buildings clad in combustible materials, in another development. Inside Housing reported on Mr


Jenrick’s comments in response to questions from Shadow Secretary of State for Housing Mike Amesbury, who had asked what is being done for residents who are having to pay for waking watches in combustibly clad buildings. Mr Jenrick had asked Stephen Greenhalgh, Minister for Building Safety and Communities, to ‘investigate measures’, after Mr Amesbury reminded him that he had ‘promised to investigate the issue’.


Earlier this year, it was reported


via a freedom of information request that more than 420 buildings across England are protected by waking watches and that over 300 fires


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60