search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INDUS TRY OU TLO OK


MY VIEW Jason Hobday


Senior Family Advisor, Global Ultra High Net Worth, UBS Wealth Management


identify than an explosive conflict or botched succession, but the end result is the same. To design frameworks that are as


good at lighting the spark as they are at keeping order, we also need to emulate those companies that thrive on innovation. Forbes has a handy list, but we can all think of ones that inspire us personally. Through ingraining the right practices they are able to embed innovation within their systems and cultures. Leading families have for


some time experimented with the creation of family venture or entrepreneurial funds. A leading example is the Mok family of Hong Kong which has set up a highly structured development path that includes a family nurtured spin-off


DON'T FORGET TO PEDAL


H 1 12


ow do families keep the creative spark alive while keeping order? The awkward truth at the heart of family governance is that procedural frameworks and innovation are not natural bedfellows.


Maintaining family control through the succession of multiple


generations requires order and a framework that is clear and stable over time. Creating wealth is different. Family wealth creators tend to break the mould and are usually blessed with an abundance of energy, vision and courage. Very few of them champion bureaucracy or would hold it up as the secret to their success. So the first challenge is to get the tone right and create a family


system which promotes both stability and innovation. I always tell clients to think of a bicycle. A bicycle is a rigid framework that is absolutely useless without energy—forget to pedal and it will fall over. Used correctly it can focus and amplify the energy applied. Family frameworks without enough impetus can lead to


passivity and a lack of drive. A decline over time due to a lack of energy and a passive approach to business may be harder to


phase (ages 35—40) where family members are required to experiment in creating start-ups.1 There are variations on the theme, such as


search funds, where there are defined acquisition targets, usually aligned in some way with the original business. Another variant is a seed fund where only part of the capital is provided while the rest must be sourced elsewhere. Some try the incubator concept. But as an industry we need to go further. We need to find new and (dare I say it) innovative ways for the families to spark their own growth. As Professor Justin Craig, of Kellogg School of Management, put it to me: "Every family needs its own Skunkworks". Our job is to help them work out how to build it. The last element is the right type of people to


lead these initiatives and create the momentum. Most professionals are risk averse, if not by nature then as a result of their training. They are usually better suited to imposing discipline or limiting damage rather than driving innovation. We need a little extra, some enthusiasm and inspiration. So the first challenge is to get the balance right,


to promote energy and order. Signal that a bit of pedalling is called for. Next we need to include features in the framework to create the right conditions (including pedals). Lastly, involve the right people to inspire the next generation to get the bicycle out on the road.


. AU, K., AND C.Y.J. CHENG (2011). CREATING "THE NEW" THROUGH PORTFOLIO ENTREPRENEURSHIP. IN P. SIEGER, R NASON, P. SHARMA AND T ZELWEGGER (EDS), THE GLOBAL STEP BOOKLET, VOLUME: EVIDENCE-BASED, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS FOR ENTERPRISING FAMILIES. BABSON COLLEGE, 17 – 21.


CAMPDENFB.COM ISSUE 72 | 2018


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88