search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
By Scott McCulloch


Scott McCulloch is a North American media consultant and former Editor of CampdenFB


As tax experts digest details of Trump’s reforms,


opinion in family firm circles has been strident. Small family businesses will benefit, but bigger businesses, and those which pay 66% of the estate tax income, will not. Under current law, profits from a small business “pass


through” to the owner and are taxed at an individual rate, which can be as high as 39.6%. Jennifer Muntz, executive director of Family Business


Network North America, says the new tax treatment of the “S Corp” and “C Corp”—legal terms that define how taxes are applied to firms or individuals—has significant implications for family businesses. A C Corp is taxed separately from its owners. An


S Corp does not pay federal taxes at the corporate level. Any income or loss is “passed through” to shareholders who report it on their personal income tax returns. Losses, meanwhile, can offset other income on shareholders’ tax returns. “The reduced tax rate makes C Corps more


attractive for businesses and investment activity because of the significant savings,” says Muntz. But she cautions: “Some families with pass-through entities will need to carefully analyse the possibility of converting to a C Corp.” As for owners of C Corps, Muntz says the reduced


tax rate will affect their corporate deductions. “It would be wise to examine shareholder-employee


salaries verses dividend payments.” Pat Soldano, founder of the Policy and Taxation


Group, sees two sides of a coin. “Since many family businesses operate as pass-


through entities, they will be helped with the ability to deduct some of their income,” she says. “But they did not get the same reduction in tax as


regular and publicly-held companies.” Soldano, who sits on the board of lobby group Family


Enterprise USA, notes that family businesses also pay estate taxes. Publicly-held businesses do not. “This means family businesses are competitively


disadvantaged once again.” At least there is scope for economic benefits. Goldman


Sachs predicts an annualised GDP boost of 30 basis points in 2018-2019. The US Treasury says the bill will bring in $1.8 trillion in new revenue and projects economic growth of 2.9% a year on average. It assumes the rest of Trump’s plans—infrastructure spending, deregulation, and welfare reform—will be implemented, so who knows how much growth will emerge? Peter Barakett, president of Due Diligence Consulting,


is hopeful: “I’ve noticed an increased level of optimism about the growth of the US economy despite apprehension about the president on a personal level,”


ISSUE 72 | 2018 The Trump administration’s


decision to add a significant amount of debt through the tax legislation could leave the country broke. The national debt stands at $20.1 billion— neck and neck with the entire EU. Remember the debt-ceiling crisis


of 2011? There are audible voices in Washington D.C. who say another is on its way. Combine that with the prospect of rising interest rates and Trump’s tax reform package could swiftly undermine the consumers it seeks to relieve. How would that be for business? In Trumpian parlance: “Bad. Very bad.”


CAMPDENFB.COM 9


he says. “The most common negative comment I have heard is the inability to deduct more than $10,000 in state and local sales and property taxes.” Unfortunately, the tax reforms


will drive deficit growth. By how much? About $1 trillion over the next decade, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. Somewhat reassuringly, the body predicts reforms will increase tax revenue growth by 0.7% annually, offsetting revenue loss from the $1.5 trillion in tax cuts. Yet the reforms could move the


Federal Reserve to raise interest rates faster than it anticipates, minutes of its December meeting show. Lower taxes mean Americans will have extra cash to spend, which is good. How much more they decide to spend is uncertain.


I’VE NOTICED AN INCREASED LEVEL OF OPTIMISM ABOUT THE


GROWTH OF THE US ECONOMY DESPITE APPREHENSION ABOUT THE PRESIDENT ON A PERSONAL LEVEL


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88