search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
VIEW FROM ASIA


By Sharon Lim


Senior Conference Producer, Asia-Pacific, Campden Wealth


How did the Death Café go? Well, one family


TACKLING TABOOS TO SMOOTH SUCCESSION


principal—who did not attend—told me to my face it was bad luck to talk about death. Thankfully, there were others who did not think it was too unlucky. Mostly, they were curious what a Death Café was all about. And most came away contemplative. After the Death Café, I asked three second


and third-generation Asian wealth-holders if I could elicit their parents’ attitudes towards death. Their responses were as follows: Response #1: “Here’s my mother’s email and phone number. You can ask her.” Response #2: “Hmmmm, I am not sure how to broach this with my father. It is a bit weird.” Response #3 “I will invite you to join my father and me for breakfast, and when I take my leave, you ask him those questions.” Out of the three, I managed to meet one of


D 10


eath is a sensitive topic in all cultures, but especially in predominantly Chinese societies. Here superstitions mean some buildings do not have a fourth level because four in Cantonese sounds like “die”. Despite this wariness, it is a topic I have broached with family members in several ways over the past year with revealing results.


In October last year I took a gamble and provided a platform in


Hong Kong for family principals to talk about death. The so-called Death Café had the end goal of helping families


who were structuring their wealth, ponder on legacy matters through imagining their own ends. The Death Café is an informal, not-for-profit café-concept held to foster greater death awareness. It sprung out of the death movement in the West that commenced in the late 1950s in the US and the UK. Academia’s interest in the topic arose from a recognition that we live in a death-denying society because human beings are unique in our ability to grasp our own inevitable ends. Yet this “foresight” runs counter to a basic survival instinct. Hence we push the idea right to the back of our minds.


CAMPDENFB.COM


the fathers who was in his 70s. An Indonesian Chinese patriarch, he was investing in an area he understood and believed was important for future generations. Retirement, he felt, would just spell the end for him. While he did not delve too much into wealth transfer matters, he disclosed that he has been slowly transferring his wealth and assets to his children over the years so that they are looked after to the extent they did not need to work for, or worry about money. His life purpose was investing in just one thing—he was living his dream and vocation, which was made possible by wealth, but he stressed that luck was another key ingredient to his success. Several themes have cropped up among the


older individuals to whom I have spoken at length about death and death preparation. While a painless end is most frequently cited as a key measure of a good death, the other attributes often included not being a burden to the family left behind, and dying in full knowledge that the next generation are doing well in their respective areas of focus. Taking a cue from the older generation, I


wonder if death discussions should become normalised—not just for practical reasons. It is a difficult subject, yet it might create the opportunity for family members to come together, when they are increasingly removed from one another scattered across the globe. For multigenerational wealth to prosper, tackling the taboo of death is the ultimate way to ensure succession.


ISSUE 72 | 2018


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88