search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Figure 1: Hatchability of breeders over the trial period


Figure 3: Improved hatchability by using Methionine-Hydroxy- Analog-Chelates


Hatchability (%)


the laying performance and egg shell quality. The drop in hatchability quickly recovered and reached normal levels after 1 week. Even with such a short-term drop in productivity, the overall hatchability reached excellent levels. The quick recovery after an infection indicates an efficient


immune system, healthy animals and good management. It is well known that Mintrex fed birds have a more stronger immune system as shown by higher anti-body titres after immune challenges like vaccination. The enhanced immune response could explain why Mintrex fed birds reacted efficiently after the infection. A benchmark evaluation was used in the trial to better evaluate


the performance results: Age of the hens (weeks) + laying rate (%) * 100 Values higher than 120 indicate a very highly performing


flock. When the plateau was reached at week 29, Mintrex-fed birds continuously exceeded the reference value of 120 indicating high performing animals. Consistently exceeding the reference value of 120 is remarkable and supports the importance of supplementing diets with highly bioavailable chelated trace minerals.


Figure 2: Production number (benchmark 120)


using Mintrex in the diet, breeders are reacting with higher hatchability rates outperforming historical data (average) as well as the previous year (control group). Average hatchability (%) increased from 83.73% (Control) and


83.84% (Average) to 85.17% (Mintrex). The relative 1.71% higher hatchability is in line with other breeder studies increasing hatchability in the range of 1.9% - 4% in broiler or layer breeders. Consistently exceeding the hatchability compared to the previous year and the company average by supplementing diets with highly bioavailable chelated trace minerals supports the importance of delivering trace minerals to the tissue and metabolism of poultry. Finally yet importantly, the drop in hatchability caused by an


infection, reduced the average production parameters. Without the drop in week 37/38 (Figure 1) the overall hatchability would have been 85.67% compared to 85.17% (extrapolated by disregarding week 37/38). This means that hatchability increased by 2.3% which is perfectly in line with the experiences of previous breeder studies. It is well know that adding lower concentration of the HMTBa-


chelated trace minerals compared to the supplementation of ITM in diets for hens, results in stronger eggshell structure as seen by improved eggshell strength or thickness. This is directly visible by a reduced number in cracked or fissured eggs. Comparing the number of cracked eggs in the control diet vs. the Mintrex group (Figure 4),


Figure 4: Improved eggshell quality by using Mintrex


Hatchability results as one of the most important economic


parameters is illustrated in Figure 3 comparing results in the control group (year 2015) with the present study (year 2016). In addition, an average group is included in the evaluation. This specific group is used as a benchmark and based on the average farm results over the last years. The previous year (control group) is performing at identical levels to the average or historical data. This demonstrates that the previous flock fits very well in the overall hatchability results of the farm and can therefore be used as a real control group. By


PAGE 40 SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2017 FEED COMPOUNDER -2%


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68