FEFAC 65TH PUBLIC ANNUAL MEETING: FUTURE PROOFING


FEED The online conference included sessions that zoomed in on innovation in animal nutrition and new pathways to increased EU protein production. The recording of the event can be found online. At the digitally live-streamed 3-D platform used for the FEFAC 65th Congress: Future Proofing Feed, the keynotes speeches were delivered by the EU Agriculture Commissioner Janusz Wojciechowski, EU Farm Council President Maria do Céu Antunes, COPA President Christiane Lambert, DG AGRI Deputy Head of Unit Research & Innovation Tereza Budňáková and Frank O´Mara, President of the Animal Task Force. EU Farm Commissioner Janusz


Wojciechowski stated “The EU Commission has engaged in the Farm to Fork Strategy to examine EU rules to reduce the EU dependency on plant proteins (in particular for oilseeds and meals) by fostering EU- grown plant proteins as well as alternative feed materials”. He noted “the five ambitions of the Charter on Feed Sustainability and the Horizon Europe programme are closely linked with specific Green Deal objectives. They are evidence that the feed sector holds a key role in enhancing the sustainability of animal and arable production”. EU Farm Council President Maria do


Céu Antunes highlighted the “willingness of feed manufacturers to contribute to a fair, digital transition of our economy” echoing the EU objective “to bet on reinforcement of our strategic EU autonomy (on feed proteins)”.


Innovation in Animal nutrition The first panel discussion, featuring Eva Zamora (European Commission), Séverine Deschandelliers (FEFANA president), Dirk Ehle (Board Member of Animal Health Europe) & Reinder Sijtsma (Chair of FEFAC´s Premix and Mineral Feed Committee) was dedicated to Innovation in animal nutrition to tackle climate change & environmental impacts of the EU livestock and aquaculture sector. All speakers acknowledged the huge potential of animal nutrition to help farmers transition to more sustainable practices, including the reduction of environmental emissions but also animal health & welfare to reduce the needs for antimicrobials. They insisted on the importance of stimulating innovation through private/public and multidisciplinary partnerships benefitting from knowledge transfer from other sectors like human health. Speakers also agreed that an efficient


legal framework, in particular for feed additives (less administrative burden, better market


PAGE 58 JULY/AUGUST 2021 FEED COMPOUNDER


protection for applicants, new recognised functions for welfare and environment protection), together with possibilities to communicate to farmers on scientifically proven effects were preconditions to make these innovative feeding strategies available to farmers. However, acquisition of these solutions also requires investments at farm level, which farmers should be rewarded for and the benefits in terms of e.g. reduction of livestock emissions at individual farm level should be captured by models used by Member States for their emissions inventories. Improvement in accuracy of models will also require public investments in research. Public communication efforts and stakeholders engagement were an essential element of the puzzle to tackle concerns of EU citizens with regards to certain innovations, in order to foster EU ambitions to become a model of successful transition to more sustainable food systems.


New pathways for EU protein production The second panel discussion, featuring Michael Scannell (Deputy Director-General, DG AGRI European Commission), Pekka Pesonen (Secretary-General, Copa-Cogeca), Régis Fournier (President Euroseeds) & Asbjørn Børsting (FEFAC President) was dedicated to acknowledgement that the new CAP reform provides several elements like voluntary coupled support, eco-schemes and rural development investment programs that can help boost protein production in the EU and reduce the EU dependency on rich protein feed materials. All speakers agreed that innovation is


a “must have” tool to ensure the success of the Green Deal and its Farm to Fork Strategy. New tools should be provided by suppliers and more importantly allowed to be used by farmers to produce more with less to mitigate climate change impacts. This is the case especially when it comes to New Genomic Techniques. Panellists agreed that this modern plant breeding technology may significantly contribute to increasing the EU protein self-sufficiency as well as to help reduce the footprint of feed production. It is, therefore, necessary that the EU legislators will swiftly introduce a favourable framework that allows industry and farmers to use them, following public consultations and impact assessments. The EU must not isolate itself from the international trade environment that is generally favourable to NGTs. Michael Scannell, DG AGRI, stated


“feed manufacturers are well-advised to promote sustainable sourcing practices and traceability of feed materials to respond to retailers questions where they are sourced from”. He pointed to two new EU planned initiatives, the upcoming voluntary Code of Conduct for Responsible Business & Marketing Practices in the food chain and mandatory due diligence measures, with a key focus on deforestation-free supply chains. FEFAC President, Asbjørn Børsting replied by referring to “FEFAC‘s


Soy Sourcing Guidelines 2021, including the possibility for verification and certification programmes to be benchmarked on ‘conversion-free soy’, as a proactive initiative to facilitate the transition to a more sustainable supply chain, with clear progress on the ground (78% of soy used coming from low-risk deforestation areas and 49% of soy usage in the feed industry according to FEFAC’s SSG criteria in 2019). The day ahead of the online conference,


FEFAC published the Feed Sustainability Charter Progress Report 2021. This publication contains an overview of FEFAC activities and deliverables from the past year in relation to the five Charter ambitions on how the European Feed Industry can contribute to the development of more sustainable livestock and aquaculture value chains.


EVONIK PROVES ECOLOGICAL ADVANTAGES OF ITS FEEDING SOLUTIONS FOR SWINE AND


POULTRY A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) by Evonik has further demonstrated the ecological advantages of using its feed amino acids and feeding concepts compared with common animal nutrition practices. The global LCA analyzed the environmental impact of feeding swine, broiler chickens, and laying hens. The study was audited and certified by TÜV Rheinland according to ISO 14040 and 14044 in second quarter 2021. “Our system solution – based on a


balanced amino acid profile, low crude protein content, and our amino acid products – can contribute significantly to reducing the environmental footprint of livestock farming, without compromising animal welfare,” says Dr. Emmanuel Auer, head of Evonik’s Animal Nutrition business line. “And we need to use this scope to meet the animal protein needs of a growing world population without overstretching natural resources.” The Animal Nutrition business line is


part of Evonik’s life sciences division Nutrition & Care, which is all about developing sustainable solutions for a better life for people and animals. Auer: “It is impossible to meet the challenges of our times with single products. This is why we concentrate all our knowledge and experience on developing targeted system solutions.” In 2010, Evonik pioneered its first


TÜV-certified comparative LCA for feed supplementation with the essential amino acids methionine, lysine, threonine, and tryptophan. In 2015, a second followed, which also included valine. In both instances, feeds without amino acid supplementation served as a comparison. “Today, amino acid supplementation


is common practice in many parts of the world,” says Dr. Jan-Olaf Barth, head of the Efficient Nutrition product line at Evonik. That was taken into account in the current study, as were regional differences in feed


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68