The Last Word Comment


Why honest people cheat sometimes


Psychologically, what goes through people’s minds when they are thinking to cheat the system?


Sebastian Speer PhD candidate, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University


Every day we have the opportunity to lie, cheat and be dishonest for personal gain. Alternatively, we can choose to be a ‘good person’ and uphold our positive moral self- image. It is generally assumed that our cognitive control or ‘willpower’ steers people away from immoral decisions.


Cognitive control However, according to our new research from Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University (RSM), cognitive control does not serve the same purpose for everyone. In fact, this control actually enables cheating for people who are usually honest, while it facilitates honest decisions for cheaters. Using an MRI scanner, I, along with


Professors Ale Smidts and Maarten Boksem, examined how different areas of the brain promote cheating or honesty. We found that a brain region frequently


associated with the processing of reward was more strongly activated for cheaters during the decision-making process, whereas honest people showed higher activity and connectivity in a network of regions related to self-referential thinking.


Remarkable The most remarkable findings, however, concerned the involvement of brain areas responsible for cognitive control. Surprisingly, we found that for honest


participants, more cognitive control was needed to cheat, whereas for participants who cheated frequently, control was needed in order to be honest. So, if you are a fundamentally honest person, it will take cognitive effort to cheat, while compulsive cheaters will have to work hard in order to


50 “Cheaters must exert willpower to


override their greedy tendencies to be honest, while honest people need to inhibit their honesty to occasionally profit from small lies. Thus, the role of willpower depends on a person’s moral default.” Cheating was measured by using a


visual search task in the MRI scanner. Participants were presented with pairs of images and were told that there were always three differences between the image pairs. In reality however, these differences were not always present. So, when participants indicated they


By understanding how different neurocognitive processes determine honesty or dishonesty in different individuals these insights can prove instrumental in the development of more efficient strategies to reduce dishonesty and strengthen trust in society


be honest. That is, whether someone will cheat or not is not only dependent on her willpower, but also on her moral default. Professor Boksem sayd: “These findings


speak to the age-old question of whether people are at their core moral or immoral. The answer, it turns out, is ‘it depends’: individuals are distributed along a continuum ranging from extremely honest, to dishonest.


www.CCRMagazine.com


found three differences, but there were actually only one or two differences between the images, the researchers knew that the participants lied. The greater the reward for finding the differences, the greater was the temptation to lie. Professor Smidts says: “There are immense


economic costs caused by dishonest behaviour, such as tax evasion, music piracy or business scandals, so finding effective ways to reduce dishonest behaviour are of great relevance to policy makers. “Also, during the COVID 19 pandemic


dishonesty in form of selling low quality face masks and fraud on governmental subsidies are highly prevalent, which highlights the relevance of our findings.” By understanding how different


neurocognitive processes determine honesty or dishonesty in different individuals these insights can prove instrumental in the development of more efficient strategies to reduce dishonesty and strengthen trust in society. CCR


This study was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).


September 2020


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52