This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
In Focus Consumer Credit


Borrow now, more later


Is there a case to be made that the UK should keep on borrowing?


Arthur Kaufman Independent writer and speaker arthur35art@hotmail.co.uk


It goes without saying that reputable banks and credit firms do not want individual clients to borrow more than they can afford to pay back within a reasonable time, since it is not in the interests of either creditors or debtors, particularly the latter? But before you ask “explain why”,


remember that on a national level, it is acceptable to borrow in multiples of billions extending into the trillion range, with the number of digits increasing accordingly, leaving the question of how many more noughts will be added in the foreseeable future or not 'before too long’, neither of which is of much use when trying to predict just when the actual 'when' will occur.


No full stop As for the currently corvonarised UK, it looks that its latest debt load is breaking all records, but with no sign of society coming to a full stop, or by a sudden rush on wheelbarrows


to carry enough cash (or wallets full of credit cards) for purchasing essentials items. Luckily the fiscal wagon is still running


on four wheels, although how long its horse power will hold out is uncertain because the country will soon be so deep in hock and in danger of being drawn into a gigantic redder than red hole where even the most minute quark cannot escape from. If the UK can obtain as much money just


when it decides to, why not the same for its regions, its counties or its cities large and small? I suspect that most economists or bankers – especially the latter who, it is alleged, got us into the 2007-2008 debacle – might offer us ready-made reasons why this cannot not be done, even though they would not openly object to the government accruing an expanding universe of sovereign debt. The way things are at the moment, it


seems the advice of astrophysicists could prove more helpful instead.


I suspect that most economists or bankers – especially the latter who, it is alleged, got us into the 2007-2008 debacle – might offer us ready-made reasons why this cannot not be done, even though they would not openly object to the government accruing an expanding universe of sovereign debt


Prior to Covid Interestingly enough, prior to Covid-19, the government was becoming increasingly concerned about the worrying rise in personal debt, when the nation's financial state was apparently affected by, on average, how much each of us owed when credit and instant loans were so readily available. Even worse, there was lots of advice on


how to how to apply for more, including by smart tapping into smarter devices in order to pay off an existing balance at an enticing offer, entirely free of interest to begin with! Still, the monthly statements of balance


due would not go away, no matter how sophisticated the electronics, nor would the likelihood of having to ask for more, sooner or not much later.


Incomprehensible What seems odd, if not incoherently incomprehensible, that the UK is able


September 2020 www.CCRMagazine.com


>> 23


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52