search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The new norm – Part II


Lead designer Renaud Bañuls digs a little deeper into the design philosophy behind Thomas Coville’s spectacular new Sodebo 3 Ultim with a look at a new generation of foils and the essential part being played by numerical simulation as the Ultim class moves deeper into full foiling


As was touched upon in Part 1 last month, a major innovation on Sodebo Ultim 3was to improve drastically the Passive Speed (the inherent speed of a yacht before applying any sailor inputs) of the chassis and the sail plan. The big challenge in the latest generation


of Ultim came from the larger foils that must be designed, engineered and then suc- cessfully manufactured if we are to achieve the performance gains of up to 25 per cent that we identified are available depending on wind speed and angle. On the previous generation of Ultim,


including the former Sodebo 2 (ex-Geron- imo), the curved foils fitted were still prim - arily assisting the buoyancy of the floats to


46 SEAHORSE


deliver what we call the ‘skimming’ mode with the outer hulls each just kissing the sur- face of the water. They were only efficient at relatively high speed, and only started to make the boat fully flying when Thomas later installed rear foils on the rudders. When full foiling was achieved it was still a compromise between two technologies. The latest generation of larger foils start


to be efficient and make the boats fully flying far earlier. However, this huge potential doesn’t necessarily make the new Ultim a ‘fully flying boat’. Even if they can fully fly at a relative low boat speed no one knows today how long a solo skipper will be able to make his Ultim fly around the planet in reasonable safety.


Foils and the Passive Speed approach To design the foils of Sodebo Ultim 3 we enjoyed a strong collaborative partnership with Thomas [Coville] and his Sodebo in-house design team (in particular Yves Mignard and Jean-Mathieu Bourgeon), together with the renowned foil expert Martin Fischer and structural engineer Steven Robert. Foiling requires a lot of work from the


sailor. We all saw during the 35th America’s Cup the AC50s foiling with the crew constantly grinding or cycling to


provide a consistent level of power to the helmsman (or flight controller) as he continuously adjusted the foils and rear rudder and elevator pitch to stabilise the flight. This human input is what we dubbed Active Speed in Part I. Trimming the foils and the rear foils


requires time and energy. It is easy to understand that it is much more demand- ing for a solo skipper on a huge and very powerful trimaran. An America’s Cup team will conceive


fast foils with maximum operating effi- ciency, getting the expected lift for the minimum drag. But this approach will of course require active control from the crew to keep the boat stable. On Sodebo Ultim 3, mainly dedicated


to solo racing, such stability will not depend upon active control from Thomas. Nor can it come from an automated flight- control system as this is not allowed by the current Ultim class rule. So the flight stability on Sodebo 3 has to be passive, being derived inherently from the design.


Stability vs performance In other words, fast foils for our purposes require active stability. But that passive dynamic stability in the design of the foil necessarily impacts its performance. Meanwhile, sailing an Ultim single-


PHOTOS FRED MORIN/SODEBO


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115