search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Taming the talent


Most Seahorse readers know of legendary America’s Cup helmsman Charlie Barr. Fewer will be aware how much that level of competitiveness on the water needed channelling in order to deliver the required results. John Rousmaniere


There were three motivations for me to write a short history of the New York Yacht Club Race Committee. First, although a beneficiary of race committees for many years, I have long considered them to be mysterious. Second, I was intrigued by a request to contribute to a project honouring the club’s 175th anniversary this year. As for the third, I’ve long been nagged by


a yachting history mystery. On one day in 1901 the boat sailed by Charlie Barr, one of the very greatest racing sailors, was disqual- ified from the final race of the America’s Cup defender trials – and yet on the next day he and his boat were chosen to defend the Cup, which they did successfully in one of the closest matches in Cup history. Today the club’s race committee’s 110


36 SEAHORSE


women and men run races of most types for boats ranging from 20-footers to ocean racers to J-Boats. But when it was founded as the Regatta Committee in the club’s second year, 1845, there was just one race. Commodore John Cox Stevens issued this vague instruction: ‘Arrange the Annual Regatta.’ How this was to be done was up to the


three officials. Sometimes the committee was a judiciary body making decisions on shore, and sometimes it was an umpire calling fouls and assigning penalties on the water. A dramatic example of the umpire role appeared at the start of the first race in the 1885 America’s Cup, when the club’s Cup defender Puritan attempted a start on port tack and succeeded only in poking her long bowsprit into the mainsail of her star- board tack opponent, the challenger Genesta. ‘She fouled us!’ the Puritan syndi- cate chairman shouted at race officials. ‘We claim the race. We will sail the course’. Hearing this, the committee’s 38-year-


old chairman, J Frederick Tams, replied, ‘No, you won’t, not by a damned sight!’ Following a brief conference with his two committee members, Tams announced that Puritan was disqualified and then instructed Genesta’s owner, Sir Richard


Sutton, that he had time to make repairs and sail around the course. Sutton declined: ‘We want a race. We don’t want a walkover.’ In 2018 the America’s Cup Hall of Fame instituted an award in Sutton’s name ‘to encourage and recognise the spirit of the America’s Cup’, as set down by the founding Donors in their Deed of Gift ‘to promote friendly competi- tion between foreign countries’. Person- ally, I think Fred Tams also deserves an honour… for insisting on law and order. Puritan’s aggression was not atypical at


that time, in the 1880s, when competition was so fierce and undisciplined that one sailor complained, ‘We are consumed by a madness for speed and everything is sacri- ficed to that quality.’ The NYYC Regatta Committee responded in 1888 with a long list of new rules and procedures. Crowd- ing on starting lines was eased with smaller classes and the English two-gun starting system, which allows more time for boats to start. To encourage identifica- tion of culprits and protests boats were required to display sail numbers and be prepared to fly bright red Bravo flags. The most radical new regulation was


Rule 19: ‘A yacht which shall be disquali- fied twice in one season shall be debarred


Artokoloro/AlAmy


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115