The Embroidery Column
Why more embroidery orders does not always mean more production capacity
Work efficiency is crucial when running a business, so much so that it may be worth looking at your work processes to make the most out of your machines and flow. Charlotte Darling, director of Amaya UK, looks at how embroidery production is changing.
O
ne of the biggest conversations we are currently having with
embroidery businesses is not about getting more orders, it’s about how to cope with them once they arrive. For many companies, growth creates a slightly unexpected problem.
Demand increases, opportunities start opening up, but production capacity doesn’t always grow at the same pace. In the early stages of an embroidery business, production is often straightforward. Machines are busy, jobs are completed one after another, and the workflow feels manageable. That setup can work perfectly well for years.
However, things begin to change when customer expectations start shifting, which is becoming more apparent. Our customers are regularly dealing with: • Shorter lead times. • Smaller and more varied runs. • More personalisation. • Faster turnaround expectations. • Last-minute order changes.
At the same time, quality and consistency still need to remain high.
The natural reaction is just to push harder operationally, by extending hours, trying to increase production speed, squeezing more jobs into the day and minimising downtime wherever possible.
Sometimes that works in the short term. But often, it simply adds pressure without truly creating more capacity.
What we are starting to see across our industry is a shift in mindset around how embroidery production is structured. Rather than viewing embroidery as one continuous workflow where job A must finish before job B starts, more companies are moving towards what we would describe as parallel production.
In simple terms, that means multiple jobs running at the same time across independent embroidery heads or systems. So instead of:
| 48 | June 2026
Finish Job A > then start Job B > then start Job C. Production becomes:
Job A + Job B + Job C running simultaneously.
It sounds simple, but the impact can be significant.
One head may be running a repeat bulk order while another handles personalised names or a smaller custom job. Urgent work can be inserted into production without disrupting the entire schedule. Operators can prepare garments while other machines continue running. The result is often a smoother production flow rather than simply ‘faster embroidery’.
Most embroidery bottlenecks are not caused by stitch speed alone; they are affected by the interruptions around production: • Hooping. • Thread changes. • Colour changes. • Garment loading. • Setup time. • Job transitions. • Machine stoppages.
Businesses want to create workflows that are more predictable and easier to manage under pressure, particularly now that customers expect fast turnaround as well as increasingly customised orders. To manage this shift, you need to be looking at modular embroidery systems.
Unlike traditional fixed multi-head machines, modular systems allow embroidery heads to operate independently. That means businesses can run different jobs simultaneously without tying the entire
Melco Summit embroidery machine
production line to a single order. Systems such as the Melco Summit have helped drive discussion around this type of production setup, particularly for businesses handling mixed order types, personalisation and shorter production runs. That’s not to say traditional multi-head machines no longer have a place, far from it. For long-run production environments with repeat designs and consistent workflows, they can still be incredibly effective. But we are finding that as the market shifts further towards on-demand production and personalisation, flexibility is becoming increasingly important when businesses look at future scalability.
Ultimately, there is no single ‘perfect’ production model for every embroidery company. The right setup depends on factors such as: • Order volumes. • Average run lengths. • Staffing structure. • Customer expectations. • Levels of personalisation. • Scheduling requirements.
What does seem clear, however, is that growth alone does not automatically create scalable production. At a certain point, businesses often need to rethink not just how hard their equipment is working, but how production itself is organised. Sometimes the answer is improving workflow efficiency. Sometimes it is reducing downtime between jobs. And sometimes it is exploring whether the current production setup is flexible enough to support the next stage of growth. The real challenge today is not simply winning more embroidery orders. It’s being able to process those orders efficiently, consistently and profitably as customer expectations continue to evolve. If this topic rings some bells relating to your business, and you would like to discuss different approaches to your embroidery production, workflow flexibility or scalable setup options, the team at Amaya would be happy to chat this through with you.
www.printwearandpromotion.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
