The Transfer Print Column
Boost your transfer decoration productivity in 2026
The famous phrase ‘time is money’ is applicable in all walks of life. Sometimes, instead of adding more to a workflow, it may be better to look at being more efficient. Andy Rogers, marketing director at Stahls’ UK, explains how revising your workflow could benefit your business in 2026.
Smooth out your workflow
Imagine what your business could achieve with that extra capacity.
How to Audit Your Process 1. Empower your team – Productivity audits work best when operators are involved. Make it a collaborative effort – they’ll often have insights you haven’t considered.
2. Benchmark your workflow – Pick your most common garment and transfer combinations and time every step with a stopwatch. This is your baseline.
W
hen was the last time you really audited your workflow?
Transfer printing remains one of the fastest and most cost-effective ways to decorate garments – but efficiency isn’t automatic. In fact, many decorators are leaving productivity – and profit – on the table simply by not measuring their process.
At Printwear & Promotion LIVE! This year, I asked the audience a simple question: “Do you know exactly how long it takes to fuse a T shirt?” Shockingly, a large number of attendees didn’t. For context, the average fusing time is just 41 seconds. Knowing this number is the first step toward unlocking real gains in your business.
Identify hidden time wasters Take a hard look at your habits. How many steps in your workflow exist because ‘we’ve always done it that way’?
One common culprit is unnecessary re-pressing after peeling the transfer
| 38 | June 2026
carrier. This can add five to 10 seconds per garment without improving the print. High-quality heat transfers only require a short pre-press (3 to 5 seconds), followed by the main press (10 to 12 seconds, depending on transfer type).
Eliminating extra steps isn’t just theoretical – it can reduce fusing time by 30-50%, cutting turnaround times and freeing up capacity.
Small gains multiply Even tiny time savings can scale dramatically. One UK decorator we worked with had two operators spending 20 to 30 seconds double-checking placement on each shirt for a diagonal design. With 100 shirts per day, that added up to 46 lost days per operator each year. After implementing a proper laser-guided alignment workflow, placement time dropped from 30 seconds to just 5 seconds per garment – saving 36 days per operator annually.
3. Spot inefficiencies – Compare each step against the recommended fusing instructions. Even a 5-second improvement per shirt adds up quickly over hundreds of garments. 4. Optimise your equipment – Small enhancements can make a big difference:
- Quick slip covers for your bottom platen can shave 11 seconds per garment.
- Threadable press stands save another five seconds per shirt. For decorators fusing 500 garments daily, these optimisations can translate to more than 50 working days saved per operator annually.
The 2026 Mindset
Every second counts when you’re working with transfers. By auditing your workflow, eliminating unnecessary steps, and optimising your equipment, you’re not just saving time – you’re increasing capacity, reducing stress, and boosting your bottom line. 2026 is the year to stop guessing and start measuring. When you know your numbers, you can make meaningful gains every single day.
• For a more in-depth look at how this process works, check out the video tutorial on Stahls’ UK YouTube.
www.printwearandpromotion.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
