www.heatingandventilating.net
Shift change in cooling?
W
ith continued efforts to improve energy efficiency, save water and reduce noise in hospitals and health care buildings, hospital
trusts around the UK are being forced to rethink the way in which they heat and cool premises and equipment. Cooling towers have for many years been the cooling
system of choice to help cool down HVAC equipment within a hospital environment, however there are alternative technologies. Many Trust specifiers, working on new construction projects or rolling refurbishment programmes, are favouring some of these alternative technologies. Some opt for hybrid coolers which combine a small amount of dry cooling, using oversized heat exchange coils, with the evaporative cooling methods of a traditional cooling tower. Many others are waking up to the superior capabilities of adiabatic cooling technologies, offering enhanced efficiency and reducing the labour- intensive maintenance and reporting procedures. However, alongside all the potential energy and maintenance efficiencies of adiabatic systems, there is one topic in particular which is driving this shift change: Legionella control. With increasingly complex compliance regulations, expansive maintenance procedures and local authority reporting procedures to meet, reducing the risk of waterborne pathogens in cooling equipment can deliver significant benefits for hospital trusts.
Controlling risk
Adiabatic system with low noise attenuators
Healthcare
Matthew Griffin
Cooling towers have been used to dissipate heat from ventilation, air conditioning and heating systems in hospital applications for decades, but change is afoot. Here, Matthew Griffin, adiabatic cooling specialist for Transtherm Cooling Industries, explains the shift change towards dry/wet evaporative cooling methods for NHS Trusts and private healthcare environments
Reducing evaporative cooling
Whilst there are a number of variables which will affect whether biofilm forms and dangerous pathogens grow, evaporative cooling can be more dangerous. Put simply, the more evaporative cooling, the higher the risk of Legionella. Reducing a hospital’s reliance on evaporative cooling methods, therefore, will instantly reduce the risk of contaminated water being transported through the air. As a general rule, cooling towers rely on evaporative
cooling 100% of the time, no matter what the temperature, whilst hybrid cooling plant uses evaporative cooling methods for around 50% of the year, only switching to dry mode in temperatures lower than 9.6°C, most commonly between January and April and then again in November and December. Adiabatic technology, however, can work efficiently in dry cooling mode for 97% of the year when operating in the UK climate – only switching to evaporative cooling when temperatures exceed 21-23°C. Working around the clock in mission critical environments, this equates to a tiny 3% of the year.
Maintenance and reporting
Cooling towers are a known source for potential Legionella outbreaks in a hospital environment, with additional risk factors affecting neighbouring communities situated downwind from a poorly maintained system. Dissipating heat through a process of conduction between water and air,
Adiabatic cooling outperforms other methods of cooling
Risk of contamination is just one consideration for hospitals and of the three technologies listed, adiabatic cooling is the only one which can be exempt from the admin-intensive process which requires equipment to be registered with the local authority in case of Legionella outbreak – another significant advantage for hospital trusts. In fact, Transtherm’s adiabatic cooler range was
cooling towers, by design, break water droplets into smaller particles in order to multiply the amount of water surface in contact with the air to speed up evaporation and the overall cooling effect. Many may argue that cooling towers situated away from hospital buildings are free from patient contamination risk, but outbreaks of Legionella have been traced back to poorly maintained cooling towers situated up to 150 metres from the contraction site. As the air and contaminated water droplets are drawn up through the top of the
cooling tower, they create a visible plume of moist air (depending on the humidity). Once ejected from the cooling tower, wind or even gentle air currents can transport contaminated water droplets through open windows, into neighbouring residential or office areas, or straight into the inlet of the hospital’s air conditioning system.
www.heatingandventilating.net
designed around direct advice from the British Health and Safety Executive’s leading Legionella Risk Assessors. Maintaining a cooling tower to a standard which is adequate for the prevention of dangerous bacterium also requires considerable ongoing financial investment and a stringent maintenance programme, combining costly and environmentally damaging chemicals and weekly manpower on site. Weekly dip slide tests and chemical dosing, plus commissioning the complete strip down and rebuild of the cooling tower structure on a bi-annual basis are all basic requirements in the maintenance of this equipment. In contrast, hybrid and adiabatic coolers can deliver numerous maintenance,
risk-assessment and remote monitoring benefits, saving time and money in the process. Adiabatic technology, for example, inherently prevents the production and transmission of Legionella through a pre-commissioned UV system fitted as standard.
May 2018 27
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53
