Opinion - Green Energy


Powering progress: when AI meets climate


Dr Brian Williamson, chief strategy officer at AI engine Kreoh, explores the consequences of the growing energy requirements of artificial intelligence.


A


rtificial Intelligence (AI) stands as a beacon of innovation, offering transformative advances across almost every sector. But as AI becomes more powerful and more pervasive, it brings with it a growing dilemma: its hunger for energy.


According to the IMF and other global observers, AI is becoming an increasingly large contributor to energy demand, driven by massive data centres, high-intensity model training and real-time inference at scale. The question is no longer whether AI will impact the climate, it is how we ensure it helps rather than harms. Training a single large language model can consume as much energy as a small town uses in a week. As deployment scales across healthcare, finance, manufacturing and government, global data centre energy demand is expected to more than double by 2030.


This growth is unsustainable without significant changes to infrastructure, regulation and design philosophy. Ironically, some of the most promising use cases for AI are in making other systems more energy-efficient: • Smart energy grids using AI for demand forecasting and renewable energy balancing


• Building automation systems that optimise lighting, heating and cooling in real time


• AI-enhanced chip design reducing the energy footprint of next-generation hardware


• AI for battery management, as with Apple’s new AI-powered system in iOS 19, which extends battery life by intelligently learning user behaviour


We are also seeing innovations in neuromorphic computing and event-driven AI models (e.g. the Spiking Neural Network) which consume drastically less energy than traditional deep learning models, in some cases, approaching the efficiency of biological systems.


In these scenarios, AI does not just “offset” its own footprint. It could eliminate meaningful power usage altogether, particularly when deployed on-device or in ultra-low-power environments like edge IoT.


So, should AI have an energy label? Yes, and urgently. Consumers now expect energy ratings


“Training a single large language model can consume as much energy as a small town uses in a week.”


on fridges, washing machines and televisions. Shouldn’t we expect the same transparency for AI? Imagine an AI system with an Energy Impact Rating, clearly indicating its model training cost in kWh; its inference energy per user session and its hosting efficiency, whether green hosting or fossil-based. This would:


• Help customers and businesses choose responsibly


• Push vendors to optimise for energy as well as performance


• Allow regulators to set efficiency standards for AI


For AI to continue driving economic growth without derailing net-zero targets, we need a shared response: • Policymakers must create incentives for energy-efficient model design and deployment.


• Companies should disclose the energy use of their AI systems, not just the outcomes. • Developers must bake energy constraints


into their system design from day one.


• Investors should ask not only, “What can this model do?” but “What does it cost the planet to do it?”


AI will not magically reach a zero-carbon footprint. But if we pair it with smart legislation, innovative engineering and greater public transparency, it can become one of the greatest climate tools we have. The question is: will we demand it?


Dr Brian Williamson is chief strategy officer at Kreoh, an innovative tech disruptor and multi-agent AI engine, specialising in the application layer of AI. With a background in


strategic leadership and AI’s impact on professional services, Brian explores the intersection of technology, society and ethics. He is passionate about empowering professionals to harness AI responsibly while preserving the expertise that defines their industries.


ewnews.co.uk


November 2025 electrical wholesaler | 33


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44