Roger Nichols, 6G program manager, Keysight Technologies explores 6G’s impending impact


he end of 2020 will see only 2% of the world’s 8 billion mobile

subscriptions as 5G. But, even though the vision for 5G is still far from being realised, the time required to develop a new generation of wireless means that work on 6G has already started. Whitepapers from the ITU, Samsung,

Docomo, and the University of Oulu, describe futuristic use cases and network attributes for 6G. Traditional key performance indicators (KPI) include data rates to 1Tbps, mobility of 1000kmph, and latency of 0.1ms. New KPI’s include precision and accuracy of timing (“in time” and “on time” communications) and the ability to pinpoint location to centimeters. I am often asked what design and

testing will be like for 6G and I believe I can anticipate a few things: 1. Testing will happen in both traditional and new domains

2. Test technology and solutions will evolve over time

3. Complex system-level validation for the entire system will take an even bigger role than in previous generations With history as an indicator, it is safe

to say that this will take some time. Automated mobile radio systems were conceived in the early 1970s building upon frequency reuse concepts patented by Bell Labs in the late 1940s. NTT launched first commercial system in 1979, followed by the Saudi and Nordic launches of NMT in 1981, and then by AT&T’s 1983 launch of AMPS in the USA. Each subsequent generation has launched at one-decade intervals. The next step now is for 6G to become an integral part of society. The industry


6G: Next Generation Wireless and the Impact on Measurement

puts contestant pressure on the state of the art of affordable technology. That same pressure also drove the

evolution of test and measurement requirements. We started with considerable focus measuring radio physics: power, sensitivity, and interference issues. Now we measure things like scheduler efficiency and even “quality of service” (QoS). 5G will bring system-level issues related to requirements for security, reliability, latency, and system power consumption. The increasing demands from industry and society, required simulation, design, measurement, and validation to evolve from physics related to voice and data performance, and then to system performance. Societies and governments are paying

close attention to 5G with special interest in public safety, information security, and national interests. This implies design and validation requirements, not just for new physical attributes - like time-precision and jitter, but also for system wide attributes including service level agreement (SLA) adherence and “quality of experience” (QoE). In 6G, we can even foresee policy-driven requirements for system level performance. Some of these changes are visible to us

now as we help our customers with 5G technology. However, we also get questions like: How can I validate what I am providing in my SLA with my customer? What is causing the problems with voice quality? How can we ensure mobile games run properly in the network and on specific mobile devices? What level of security can be guaranteed? 6G will drive new technical demands

in five major areas: • Next generation radio • Integrated heterogeneous multi-radio access technology (RAT) systems

• Time engineering in networks • AI based networking • Advanced security

All but the first of these will have to be

validated from the physical level to the system level. As mentioned above, governments

around the world are engaged in intense dialogue on 5G as it relates to security and national interests. Regional and community governments are developing local ordinance related to mobile device usage, cell siting, and electromagnetic exposure. Also, earlier in the 5G lifecycle than in previous generations, departments of defence are exploring the use of 5G for their needs. If you still have your doubts about the

impact of policy, consider early radio history: the universal call of distress: S- O-S was not always the standard. These three symbols, which were chosen because of their simplicity and ease of distinction, were standardised at the International Radio Telegraph Convention of Berlin in 1906. The Titanic disaster in 1912 led to the

Roger Nichols, 6G program manager, Keysight Technologies

standardisation of not only a common distress radio channel, but also international maritime law stipulating that all shipboard radio telegraph offices had to be staffed at all times. So, we have early policy already dictating 1) message types, 2) radio channels, and 3) behaviour. With radio systems a fundamental part of society, we can expect to see more.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46