search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Data acquisition


HOW DATA CAN IMPROVE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING


Across process applications, maintenance teams are in a constant battle to maintain operational productivity and minimise downtime. Although maintenance team resources are often stretched, implementing data-driven diagnostics can enhance their capabilities. This approach can minimise the potential of maintenance challenges developing long-term, as well as increasing the speed of response to emergency situations. The good news is that the required hardware might already be installed as an existing feature of process control. Even if not, integrating the right technology could be easy to set-up, and provide a fast return on investment. Bürkert industry manager, Greg Wainhouse, explains how to achieve an effective, data-driven diagnostic maintenance system.


oday, there is an availability of data throughout industrial processes like never before. Whether it is the water treatment sector, food and beverage production, or pharmaceutical manufacture, data is everywhere. The significant advantage for maintenance engineering teams is the improvement to diagnostics it can help to achieve. Data analysis can give an awareness that enhances preventative maintenance, minimising the prospect of unexpected downtime. In the event of maintenance emergencies, data can also enable a faster, more effective response. The crucial advantage of automated control is that data, whether emerging from a component such as a valve or a sensor, can be collected, in real-time, in a continuous stream. As a result, this data can be analysed to provide reports, giving intelligence over time to enable effective diagnostics, as well as automated alerts. However, this data omnipresence can be overwhelming. For a data-driven approach to help achieve effective diagnostics, maintenance teams need a clear plan of what data they need, and how they are going to collate and analyse it. While establishing this initial process management stage


T 16


takes time initially, embracing data availability can reduce the time, cost, and efficiency of maintenance engineering in the long run.


WHAT TO DO WITH THE DATA? A common challenge is an awareness of what to do with the available data, and the benefits that effectively managing it can bring. A workable approach to identify where to collate data from, is to prioritise the equipment, as well as their constituent components, in an operations-critical order. This inventory will span a time period of urgency, from issues that would demand emergency attention, to challenges that could signal a longer-term problem. Crucially, this


approach will also identify the condition indicators from which data needs to be collated and managed to achieve effective diagnostics. Starting with emergency maintenance, data- driven alerts from automated systems achieve significantly faster diagnostics to enable a rapid response. Taking pH level monitoring as an example, an important parameter across diverse processes, if a digital sensor returns an abnormal reading, real-time data can quickly confirm device health status and the validity of its reading.


As a result, the maintenance engineer can instantly realise if the fault lies with the sensor, or make a fast progression with the diagnostic procedure. Additional digital alarms may have triggered in parallel, but even if not, sensors from upstream devices, such as dosing pumps or control valves, can be compared to diagnose the issue, all from a remote setting.


EFFECTIVE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE For urgent maintenance requirements, a data- driven system can also provide an operational comparison over time, giving greater context to help understand the actual source of the fault, supporting a faster response. However,


September 2024 Instrumentation Monthly


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100