search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Test & measurement


HOW SMART DESIGN OVERCOMES CHECKWEIGHING CHALLENGES IN PLASTIC CUP APPLICATIONS


By Jörn Migge, head of Product & Market Management, Mettler-Toledo Product Inspection


T


he integrity of dairy products, especially those packaged in plastic cups such as yoghurt, cream cheese and ice cream, relies heavily on precise and hygienic weighing processes. Facilitating accurate weights while


maintaining stringent hygiene standards presents unique challenges for manufacturers. Understanding these and other challenges, and the innovative checkweighing solutions to tackle them head-on, can help make a great dairy production line as we explore in this article.


CHALLENGES OF WEIGHING PLASTIC CUPS IN THE DAIRY INDUSTRY Weighing plastic cups filled with dairy products presents unique challenges, primarily due to the diverse filling processes employed. There are two main types of filling processes: linear fillers and rotary fillers. Linear fillers process cups in groups, often in multi-lane applications, where


cups exit the system in groups of four or six. To minimise packaging waste, some manufacturers use checkweighers before sealing the cups and then again afterward to comply with pre-packaged goods legislation, which mandates strict adherence to weight and labelling standards. Proper sealing is critical to prevent contamination, as improperly sealed cups or those that break during production and transportation can compromise product safety and quality. If cups break, they can create a mess that contaminates other products on the line, necessitating frequent pauses in production to clean and maintain a sterile environment. Additionally, the fragile nature of plastic necessitates regular cleaning to prevent contamination both inside and outside the product. Balancing the need to reduce packaging waste while adhering to product safety and compliance with regulations remains a critical challenge in the dairy industry.


HOW SMART DESIGN PLAYS AN IMPORTANT PART IN THE PROCESS Smart design is crucial to facing these challenges head-on, and to the efficiency and hygiene of the checkweighing process. A key aspect for any dairy manufacturing line is the washdown design of a checkweighing system. Manufacturers should look for solutions that offer temperature-resistant load cells, which allow for quick re-zeroing after cleaning, significantly reducing downtime. Easy-to-remove belts can also help to facilitate fast cleaning, meaning that equipment can be swiftly sanitised to prevent biological contamination. Another key element of any good checkweighing solution is its “Poka Yoke” design – dairy manufacturers should look for one that offers foolproof reassembly, making it easy for even less experienced personnel to reassemble the equipment correctly. Advanced load cell technology, such as the FlashCell Electro- Magnetic Force Restoration (EMFR) load cell, can offer high accuracy and can handle throughputs of up to 250 packs per minute. This is essential for maintaining product integrity and compliance, as well as maximizing production throughput. The placement of the checkweigher on the production line is also a critical design consideration. Early detection of weight deviations allows for immediate feedback to the


34 October 2024 Instrumentation Monthly


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96