Test & measurement


REAL TIME MEASUREMENT HELPS DAIRIES CUT PRODUCT LOSS


From 2025, listed companies in the EU with more than 500 employees will be required to report sustainability information according to the new mandatory European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). This requirement will be expanded over the coming years to cover further categories of companies. Product loss is a significant problem at many dairies and can have a large impact on the carbon footprint. Hundreds of liters of product is often lost to the drains when liquid product is displaced with water by pushing it from one processing step to another. Frequently, as much as 1% of dairy production can be wasted in the push-out between product batches. For an average dairy plant processing 250,000 tons of raw milk annually, this means a loss of 2,500


A


tons of raw milk, as well as unnecessary CO2 emissions upstream in the supply chain. However, inaccurate measuring technologies frequently prevent operators from addressing this issue in an effective way, as it can be difficult to correctly identify the product that moves through the pipeline. But with appropriate measuring technology, the end of one batch and the beginning of the next can be accurately located. If it is not, the small losses at each push-out point, of which there can be hundreds, accumulate and become significant by the end of the process. Pipeline contents are commonly measured by one of the three technologies – flow meter, turbidity sensor or conductivity sensor. Flow meters estimate the arrival of the product at the push-out point based on the system flow rate; turbidity sensors monitor the interaction between a light beam and the liquid; and conductivity sensors operate by measuring the electrical conductivity of the liquid.


A fourth method is based on monitoring the dielectricity of the liquid, i.e. its ability to hold electric charge. This is achieved by using a sensor that accurately identifies the substance moving through the pipeline as a radiofrequency electromagnetic field is induced into the liquid. Different liquids have different dielectricity, making them distinguishable from each other, giving each liquid a unique fingerprint. “Measuring the dielectric properties of the liquid provides significant advantages over traditional approaches. Flow meters have very low accuracy and turbidity sensors cannot distinguish transparent liquids, such as whey concentrate, from water, and become clogged by thick liquids,


32


s dairies scramble to meet sustainability targets ahead of the first year of reporting for the EU CSR Directive, the significant losses in push-out processes have been identified as low hanging fruit by many companies.


like cream. The electrical conductivity of milk- based products is close to that of water, which translates into low sensitivity for conductivity sensors when detecting product interfaces,” says Matti Järveläinen, CEO of Collo, a leading manufacturer of dielectric liquid analyzing systems. “The dielectric sensor can detect any liquid, whether it is thin, thick, colored, colorless, opaque or transparent. This means that the same measuring technology can be applied across the dairy plant, while in the past the plant needed to select the sensor based on the type of liquids processed in each particular location,” adds Järveläinen. “A solution that can be scaled easily across the plant has been our goal from the start. We use sophisticated machine learning techniques to quickly calibrate our system to new liquids. The result is actionable information, like percentage of water in the product, which is transferred to the plant automation system, enabling process optimization,” Järveläinen continues. Collo sensors were recently installed in four locations in the raw milk reception of a dairy plant processing 243 million litres of raw milk per year. The plant previously used flow meters for controlling the push-outs. However, due to their low accuracy, what appeared to be optimal timing actually resulted in losses amounting to 600,000 litres per year. With the far higher accuracy of the dielectric sensor, 108 times better than the flow meter, losses were reduced to just 5,000 litres per year – a reduction by more than 99 per cent.


The dairy has now decided to introduce Collo’s solution throughout the plant and to automate the process. Large dairy and other food producers are currently increasing their efforts to reduce their environmental impact ahead of environmental targets that loom in the near future, mainly in 2025 and 2030. Most of the greenhouse gas


emissions caused by dairy operations originate at the farm. For instance, Nestlé, in its sustainability report , outlines how just five per cent of its greenhouse gas emissions comes from its own operations, whereas 95 per cent is made up of emissions in the supply chain. Raw milk production is the largest single source of emissions in dairy production, which any waste of milk-based raw material needs to be prevented and, preferably, eliminated. Other companies have similar targets. Danone is committed to reducing its own greenhouse gas emissions by 47.2 per cent by 2030 and those in the supply chain by 42 per cent. Fonterra aims to reduce manufacturing emissions by 50 per cent by 2030. The year 2025 is an important milestone for many companies, as the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development was adopted by all United Nations members in 2015 and many companies set themselves 10-year targets at the time. The European Union is committed to implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the CSR Directive is one way the business community is made to play its part. In addition to the regulatory requirements, changing consumer preferences is another powerful incentive for dairy producers to implement more eco-friendly production methods. A study by McKinsey and NielsenIQ found that products making claims related to sustainability have faster market growth – over a five-year time span, such products grew about 18 per cent more than the expectation was at the beginning of the period. “Waste in dairy processes needs to be reduced. Environmentally compatible processes are demanded by regulators and consumers alike. Wasting hundreds of liters of valuable product in every batch makes no sense when this can be prevented with the right technology. But it does not end there. With Collo’s versatile technology we can help plants reduce water use too, an area which is also of keen interest for our customers and regulators alike. Working together with its customers, Collo can play a significant role in achieving a more sustainable dairy process,” concludes Järveläinen.


ColloidTek www.collo.fi October 2024 Instrumentation Monthly


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96