search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Methodology for PCF Calculations of Lubricants, Greases and other Specialties


3.4.2 Recycling


Material recycling involves the extraction of secondary materials from waste, which can then be reused as raw materials in the manufacturing of various products. If the recycling process and use of the obtained secondary material occurs inside the lubricant manufacturer’s system boundary there is no need for specific considerations and the GHG emissions of the recycling process should be accounted for in the PCF.


However, if the recycling process occurs outside of the lubricant manufacturer’s system boundary, the following rules according to the cut-off approach shall be applied4:


• Preparatory steps and supporting activities, such as collection, transportation, sorting, dismantling, or shredding, shall be factored into the inventory results of the product system that generates the secondary product, as they have an impact on its overall carbon footprint, e.g. collection of used oil should be attributed to the re-refiner for the production of re-refined base oil.


• In the recycling process, the waste input is considered to be burden-free. This means that any burdens or credits associated with material from previous or subsequent life cycles are not taken into account and are "cut-off."


• The impact of the recycling process shall be added to the inventory results, thus influencing the PCF value of the product that uses the secondary material.


• For the product in scope the PCF of all burdens from preparatory steps and supporting activities, as well as the recycling process shall be reported.


4 Case study from IFEU/GEIR support the cut-off approach for an attributional LCA. There is an acknowledgment that the study also considered a consequential LCA. The reference is only intended to support the cut-off approach for an attributional LCA study.


Version 1.2, 15.10.2025 © ATIEL and UEIL Page 27 of 40 This document is a controlled document only in electronic form. Printed versions or copies are not subject to change service


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40