She suggested that EU leaders would probably
attempt to offset the Trump-Vance isolationism by engaging in “frantic action” to forge deeper economic and research partnerships with other “like-minded partners”, such as the UK, Canada, Australia, South Korea and Japan. Mr Trump does now seem to be an even more
hardened protectionist than before. If elected in November, he is proposing to impose at least a 10% tariff on all imports, rising to 60% on Chinese goods. His right-wing tendencies also scarcely fit easily with the new British government’s left-of-centre leanings. “Protectionist trends will clearly be worse under
a second Trump term,” according to John Clarke, former head of the EU delegation to the World Trade Organisation. “Whether it’s Trump or [Democratic presidential candidate, Kamala] Harris – and let’s hope to God it’s Harris and the Democrats – the US priority is going to remain economic security, domestic competitiveness and industrialisation, as it is likely to be the case for Europe.”
KEY POINTS FOR UNLOCKING TRADE DEALS WITH US Additionally, there are practical barriers to be overcome. Most notably, the UK’s refusal to accept imports of hormone-treated beef and chlorinated chicken. The issue scuppered a hoped-for free trade agreement between Mr Trump and then-PM Boris Johnson in 2020. And, at the start of this year, led to talks over a UK trade deal with Canada collapsing.
Even if Ms Harris wins in November, most trade
analysts are not optimistic of a deal. Although she is not regarded as being as adversarial as Mr Trump and has extensive overseas experience in her time as vice president, Ms Harris is not seen as any more prone to doing trade deals than Joe Biden. Indeed, she was only one of a handful of Democrat senators to vote against US participation in the CPTPP. There is also more at stake than trade. The Republicans’
determination to reduce immigration and the Democratic Party’s uneasy stance on the issue could lead to measures that would reduce global mobility. Although the overwhelming attention on immigration in the US focuses on the Mexican border, Mr Trump also appears ready, as he was before, to restrict some forms of legal migration. On this year’s campaign website, he says he would “deliver a merit-based immigration system that protects American labour and promotes American values”. As for the likely effects on markets, an analysis published
by VoxEU – the policy portal of the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) – concluded that the likelihood of a Trump victory would increase the volatility in the US bond market; reduce the oil price; decrease equity market volatility and boost stock prices. “Thus, financial markets expect a Trump administration
to be relatively more market-oriented than [Kamala Harris’s], less focused on environmental concerns and on the sustainability of public debt,” said the report. But while international financial markets might be
quietly confident come November, international producers and the mobility industry are less likely to be so.
61
GLOBAL LEADERSHIP
FREE TRADE AGREEMENT US
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98
