search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CLINICAL OPERATIONS & OUTSOURCING


Stakeholders in clinical research should thoroughly read and understand the entirety of document. The RBM document includes many informative statements by the Agency. While I will outline 10 key points that I feel are most relevant to risk assessment, please note that my list and opinions do not constitute a comprehensive summary of the document’s contents or a legal interpretation of the FDA’s statements. As described in Point 7 in the table on the


previous page, the Agency highlights that the traditional on-site monitoring model with 100% Source Data Verification (SDV), which is often perceived as the FDA’s preference is just a ‘perception’. The Agency has not explicitly defined a preferred method. It seems that the Agency acknowledges a risk-based approach, focusing efforts on “critical data elements and processes” as outlined in Point 8, may be more effective than the traditional 100% SDV model. Effective study oversight, investigational site


training, and monitoring all begin with a comprehensive risk assessment to identify which critical data and processes require enhanced monitoring and oversight. The risk assessment involves three variables: • Probability: the likelihood of errors occurring


Figure 1: Impact, Probability, and Detectability


• Impact: the consequences of such errors on human subject protection and trial integrity


• Detectability: the extent to which such errors would be detected Impact and probability are additive, where


an event with high probability and high impact is a high-risk event. Detectability adds a third dimension, influencing the overall risk inversely; a high-risk event with high detectability may present a lower overall risk. While the additive effect of Impact and Probability is illustrated in Figure 1, the third dimension of detectability is harder and more challenging to represent.


The first step for sponsors to effectively oversee clinical investigations starts with identifying the associated risks


Outsourcing in Clinical Trials Handbook | 27


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68