MEDICAL DEVICES
Collecting trial data outside the black box
Wearable devices and remote sensors are key to unlocking decentralised clinical trials, but not all tech is created equal.
T
hese days, anyone can track their health with the myriad off-the-shelf wearable devices available, but not all wearables
are created equal.
While devices such as the Apple Watch will do fine in tracing and monitoring vitals sch as heart rates in the homes and lives of the health-conscious average Joes, they are often not suitable for clinical research, as one Harvard biostatistician recently found out. JP Onnela, associate professor of biostatistics at the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and the developer of open-source data platform Beiwe, was considering using the Apple Watch in a collaboration with the department of neurosurgery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, but he discovered the heart rate variability data collected from the devices was riddled with inconsistencies. The issue was exacerbated by the fact that the data wasn’t raw bt filtered throgh software. These algorithms are known as black boxes
for their lack of transparency and represent a significant hrdle in decentralising clinical research with tech, which requires raw, nfiltered data. As a solution to the issue of black boxes,
realworld data device firm ivalin wors with research institutions to provide medical sensors and data analysis support. The sensors are reusable, patient-friendly and optimised for continuous vitals capture. Most importantly, they can provide raw data for the purpose of clinical research. linical Trials Arena sat down with ivalin
vice-president Sam Liu to discuss research- specific monitoring devices, why they are suited to continuous real-world data capture in remote settings and some of the
interesting trials making use of them.
Kezia Parkins: Why are commercially available wearables not usually suitable for clinical research?
Sam Liu: There’s a number of different ways that data can be collected, especially using remote patient monitoring (RPM) technologies. However, with some devices, there may be filters applied to the data when it’s collected before it is presented to the application or the clinician. Most of the off-the-shelf wearables
that the public are familiar with tend to be black box. They’re all self-contained – the formlas, filters and algorithms to derive the data are already built into the device, and the manufacturers purposely don’t expose it because most people don’t need to know that information as it can be confusing. For research though, your data may need a higher level of granlarity or fidelity.
KP: How did you recently enhance your real-world evidence biometric data platform?
SL: Sensors can collect real-world data continuously or episodically, but what happens when there’s a network disconnection or the wearer is not near a mobile device that’s going to transmit the data to the cloud? One of the enhancements we have made in
some of our devices is onboard memory, so that when you’re wearing our sensors, even if you have no network connection, Bluetooth or Wi-Fi, the sensors will still continue to collect data about you and store it on the
Outsourcing In Clinical Trials | 49
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72