CLINICAL OPERATIONS & OUTSOURCING
“At the same time, I might draw your attention to a set of other related things that are more sectorspecific. Things lie ower rchase Agreements, where we can decarbonise the electrical supply, because we do use a lot of power. ooing at things lie the healthy buildings initiative, which is something that enentech has been doing. Theres a set of things abot resilience becase disaster response, its not only a business continuity issue in pharma; its everybody else who depends on the drugs, right?”
Big pharma puts its green cap on As the climate emergency has continued to embed itself into the priorities of the business community as well as the public consciosness, pharma companies lie other sectors – have been busy setting targets and collaborating on sstainability initiatives. eid says the majority of IA member
companies have made specific pblic commitments on emissions reduction, often in line with the standards set by the Science- ased Targets initiative. ch of the sector reports its emissions and environmental impacts to the arbon isclosre roject to increase transparency with the pblic. And while IA doesnt yet mae
environmental commitments a condition of membership, Reid says “there is a possibility for future consideration of including the environment in its code of condct. On the supply chain side, there have been
efforts to wrangle some form of climate action ot of an endlessly comple networ of clients and vendors. The harmacetical pply hain Initiative, which was established by industry in 2006, sets standards for responsible supply chain management in terms of safety, social and environmental objectives. Sustainability ratings tools such as EcoVadis,
meanwhile, can help businesses in pharma and other sectors to access environmentally responsible supply chain partners while cutting down on manal de diligence. “It helps with your supply chain because
if your suppliers also get their rating, you dont have to spend so mch time doing all the audits and collecting all the materials,” says ontai.
eid, meanwhile, enthses abot IAs coharmacotewardship initiative to redce the impact of pharmaceutical products in the environment, as well as its circular economy networ and the A Indstry Alliance, which focses on the antimicrobial resistance crisis. ven clinical trials are looing to clean p their act throgh efforts by the lies of the stainable ealthcare oalition. n top of the organisations maing
sustainability in the pharma industry their eplicit mission, theres also the steady maret pressure that comes from larger drug companies setting standards for their suppliers and as choichet has observed, its often the investors who have set the pace. “[Investors] were the ones seeing the
research on long-term value and outperformance for companies that manage their softer performance aspects more effectively, and pshing it, he says. eve been creating this wor on
commnications gidance for taling to investors. The investors have fond that helpful to share with their earlier-stage portfolio companies, saying, ‘As you grow up, heres what yo shold be thining abot. ven venture capital people are starting to want to see that as part of the business gameplan for earlierstage companies. The maret isnt pshing for sstainability
standards entirely ot of the indness of its heart, of course – as investors have recognised, theres plenty of evidence that competent environmental management is entwined with a healthy bottom line. r crrent nderstanding of this linage
between environmental and financial performance is that environmental performance is usually achieved by reducing or eliminating wasteful activities – energy consumption, production waste, transportation, water consumption and so on – which reduces costs, says elhir.
Health implications: Pharma’s response to a changing climate As mch as big pharma, as a corporate networ with a globe-spanning supply chain, could be described as part of the problem when it comes to climate change, it is also undoubtedly part of the soltion or at least the adaptation.
Outsourcing In Clinical Trials | 13
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72