search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Materials What is a biosensor?


A biosensor comprises two distinct parts: ■The biological component, which acts as the sensor. ■The electronic component, which detects and transmits the signal.


The biological element interacts with an analyte (the substance whose chemical constituents are being identified and measured) and the biological response is then converted into an electrical signal by the electronic element. In a health context, biosensors can be applied to or worn on the skin, allowing continuous monitoring of data. They are typically laminated to the skin via a patch or film-like device and can capture a range of data – such as body temperature, blood pressure, oxygen saturation or blood flow.


than just attaching to it. Their study, ‘Electronic- ECM: A permeable microporous elastomer for an advanced bio-integrated continuous sensing platform’, was published in research journal Advanced Materials Technologies in May 2020.


“With this technology, we can control the fibre diameter and structure of the porous membrane, and that gives us more ability to adhere [a device] to the skin without any adhesive to support it.”


Ahyeon Koh


Below: Electrospun PDMS mimics the properties of collagen and elastin in the skin.


Right: It is also porous enough for biofluids like sweat to pass through it.


“Most types of biosensors predominantly use PDMS because of its soft mechanics, and its silicon dioxide silane group enables us to covalently bond it with the electronics,” explains Matthew Brown, the study’s lead author and a PhD candidate at Binghamton’s Koh Laboratory, situated in the Watson School of Engineering and Applied Science. “However, a limitation of these biosensors is that sweat can’t diffuse through their impenetrable substrates. In long-term monitoring applications, sweat can build up underneath a biosensor on the skin, causing inflammation and irritation, and leading to inaccuracies. “What we tried to do was create a permeable nanofibrous elastomer for these kinds of


applications, where sweat can readily diffuse through the overall device.”


Led by assistant professor Ahyeon Koh (from whom the lab takes its name), the study entailed using a process called electrospinning that applies a very high-voltage electric force to a polymeric solution, elongating the polymer and spinning it like spider silk into a nanofibrous structure similar to that of the extracellular matrix of human tissue. In this study, the goal was to recreate the properties of collagen, which strengthens tissues and makes them flexible, and elastin, which allows stretched tissue to ‘bounce back’ to its original shape and form. In other words, the electrospinning process gives the PDMS – already similar in its mechanics to human skin – yet more skin-like properties. This synthetic ‘electronic extracellular matrix’ (e-ECM) also has the permeability that allows biofluids like sweat to evaporate through it. “With this technology, we can control the fibre diameter and structure of the porous membrane, and that gives us more ability to adhere [a device] to the skin without any adhesive to support it,” says Koh.


Film versus mesh


Brown, Koh and colleagues first assessed the biocompatibility of skin keratinocyte cells on different PDMS substrates – a nonporous PDMS film (the type typically used in bioelectronics) and the new, permeable, fibrous PDMS mesh material – in vitro, comparing cells’ viability after three and seven days. The fibrous PDMS mesh yielded higher cell viability by day seven, and “allowed for increased cellular respiration and transport of nutrients, as indicated by significantly [fewer] necrotic cell clusters”. Conversely, the PDMS film “established an environment for the cells to undergo necrosis”. The team also carried out electrocardiogram (ECG) testing in a human subject, comparing the signal responses and performance of a synthetic e-ECM device with commercial ECG surface electrodes, with the aim of demonstrating that the


98


Medical Device Developments / www.nsmedicaldevices.com


Matthew Brown, Binghamton University


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133