Technically speaking: Laser cutting | 49
SNOWFLAKES AND BAUBLES
Dr Morwenna Spear of the BioComposites Centre explores laser cutting of panels O
n a trip to a timber conference recently I stumbled upon a Christmas market, which set me musing about the steady rise in laser grade sheet materials. Once the preserve of makers and enthusiasts, these days the hobby sector is booming with laser cut shapes available for all seasons in craft shops and mainstream home décor stores. No sooner have the pumpkins been sold than the reindeer and snowflakes emerge, soon to be followed by pastel coloured rabbits and eggs then onto summer holiday symbols… you name it, there will be someone somewhere willing to laser cut some plywood or MDF and sell it! So with all that said, lets focus in on the
wood panels themselves. Many laser cutters require the user to be selective about the type of panel they choose to cut or engrave. Certain grades of MDF and plywood are favoured for their uniformity through the thickness (low incidence of voids or gaps that would lead to rough-looking edges in the finished product). Birch ply was at one time the staple, but supplies have decreased due to the ongoing situation in Russia and Ukraine, so poplar has been a stand in, but tropical species can also give good results – Ceiba pentandra is one example, with a good texture. Oak can be used for its more coarse textured grain – but only when this is a design feature for the surface. In fact, oak veneer on MDF might be chosen to avoid the large pores showing on edge sections. All of this has ignored the largest issue, which is the adhesive used in the panel. Some website guidance for hobbyists recommends avoiding melamine glues or phenolic glues due to the likelihood of unpleasant chemicals or formaldehyde in the gas emitted during laser cutting. Other websites say the opposite – suggesting melamine glue is favoured as it tends to burn cleanly and vaporize rather than smoke when laser cut. How can we know which advice to follow? Other guidance indicates that panels marked as E0 would be ok, as they have low formaldehyde content. This is a different question – grades like E0, E1 etc relate to measured free formaldehyde (emitted by the panel during normal ambient conditions) – not to the decomposition during laser cutting. It relates to tests done by the
chamber method, and can be measured for any formaldehyde-based resin. So, what is really happening when the laser cutter works on the panel? The laser energy rapidly heats the wood. Certain lasers are very effective on the wood molecules, for example a CO2
laser has a wavelength
of 10.6μm (in the infrared range) rapidly providing energy to the wood, creating the plasma plume during cut or hole formation. The plasma that forms contains fragments of the wood molecules, and the adhesive molecules from the panel (which can include formaldehyde and depending on the resin perhaps also phenol). Most of the wood substance rapidly converts into CO2
and
water however some fragments are larger, and can include alkanes, phenolics and benzene. From the adhesive there might be formaldehyde and other monomers. At the edges of the laser cut some of this
material re-deposits as a char type residue, giving the dark brown sometimes seen on the cut edge or the engraved pattern. Energy received by the wood can be altered by the user adjusting the power, speed and optics to encourage formation of this char to produce the etched patterns, or to reduce char formation and increase cut efficiency. A lot of website advice skips over the other aspect, the particles produced during laser processing predominantly have an
(known as ultrafine particles) which can also
pose health risks. So it seems that good ventilation and filtration would be advisable regardless of the glue type used in the panel! Being selective about the glue type is certainly good advice but extraction systems need to be considered for industrial usage, so make good sense for many hobby users as well. ●
Above: Laser cutting of wood and panel products is popular
www.wbpionline.com | December 2025/January 2026 | WBPI
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53
