search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Self-Storage Valuation • Section 10 Self-Storage Units Occ. %


Unit Type Desc. Unit SF Units Total (SF) (Units) 5 x 5


Ext. 25 SF 50 1,250 SF 92%


5 x 10 Ext. 50 SF 100 5,000 SF 95% 10 x 10 Ext. 100 SF 100 10,000 SF 90% 10 x 15 Ext. 150 SF 100 15,000 SF 85% 10 x 20 Ext. 200 SF 50 10,000 SF 84% Totals/Averages


400 Ext. = Exterior 41,250 SF Source: © 2015 Colliers International


percent to 6 percent per year. Therefore, appraisers always take into consideration historical increases.


What Is True Economic Occupancy? Many storage facilities have no problem capturing and retaining tenants. When their occupancy statistics reports (rent rolls) are reviewed, they appear to be 85 percent to 90 percent occupied. Are these properties prime acquisition targets? They won’t have any problems achieving maximum leverage from a refinance, right? The level of occupancy of self-storage facilities can be measured in different ways.


While some owners measure occupancy in terms of square


footage, the most common measurement of physical occupan- cy is the number of storage units rented. Another key measure- ment metric is economic occupancy, which factors in discounts and concessions as well as credit loss. Essentially, physical unit occupancy is a “top line” concept, while economic occupancy is a “bottom line” concept.


It is common for economic occupancy to be 2 percent to 5


percent lower than physical occupancy due to discounts and concessions. The gap between economic and physical unit oc- cupancy widened in 2009 and 2010 as the economy struggled and more concessions were offered to maintain physical occu- pancy, but has decreased since that time in most markets.


Many operators and managers focus heavily on maintain-


ing physical occupancy, which is vital. However, spending time and energy on improving economic occupancy “bottom line” is what is most important. According to Carol Krendl, an experi- enced storage auditor and consultant based in central California with over 25 years of storage expertise, if your facility’s physical unit occupancy exceeds your dollars deposited (economic oc- cupancy) by more than 10 percent, you have at least one of the following problems:


• Too many concessions/discounts from market rent • Excess delinquency • High amount of prepaid rent • Issues with employee embezzlement/pilferage • Uncollected rents/fees


Let’s quickly focus on concessions or discounts. Doesn’t ev-


ery facility have to offer concessions or discounts and/or move- in specials? Our appraisal practice group surveys thousands of facilities each year and there is a significant variance in the concessions/discount programs employed in the marketplace. How do you determine whether to offer concessions, and what process does your facility manager or leasing staff follow to de- termine what concessions to offer (if any)? We can’t help you implement all the proper controls and collections processes, but here are three suggestions to maximize economic occupancy:


• Track occupancy and rates of turnover for all your unit types/sizes. Limit or eliminate concessions/discounts given on unit sizes with high rates of turnover.


• Implement an online payment system to make it easy and safe for your customers to pay using a debit card or one-time or recurring electronic funds transfers (these reduce charges paid to credit card companies).


• Learn, review and read your monthly reports and see if your facility’s management software has any add-ons such as fraud alerts. Take advantage of the training and support offered by your software provider.


Table 10.3 – Regional Average Occupancy Rates West


Pacific 2012


Economic 77.4% Physical 19.9% 2011


Economic 75.2% Physical 77.9% 2010


Economic 69.0% Physical 75.7% 2009


Economic 74.7% Physical 80.3% 2008


Economic 83.1% Physical 85.4%


70.3% 77.0%


79.6% 80.7%


69.9% 75.5%


76.2% 81.2%


84.0% 86.4%


Source: Self Storage Almanacs 2008-2013 (Only 2010-2011 Figures Include Facilities In Lease-up)


2016 Self-Storage Almanac 113


74.7% 75.9%


71.8% 75.8%


68.1% 75.7%


72.8% 79.2%


79.9% 82.9%


74.3% 79.7%


75.7% 79.7%


68.3% 75.7%


73.7% 79.5%


77.7% 80.3%


Mountain National 90%


Table 10.2 – Concluding Market Rent Asking Rent


Actual Rent


/Unit /SF /Month /Unit /SF /Month $40 $1.60 $1,840 $60 $1.20 $5,700 $90 $0.90 $8,100


$36 $1.44 $1,656 $55 $1.10 $5,225 $82 $0.82 $7,380


$110 $0.73 $9,350 $100 $0.67 $8,500 $130 $0.65 $5,460 $120 $0.60 $5,040 --


-- -- --


Rent Comparable Range


$30 to $50 $52 to $70 $75 to $95 $92 to $110 $105 to $130


Concluded Rent


/Unit /SF /Month $40 $1.60 $2,000 $60 $1.20 $6,000 $85 $0.85 $8,500 $100 $0.67 $10,000 $120 $0.60 $6,000 $76


$0.74 $30,500


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152