search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NATIONAL STANDARDS


NATIONAL PRIVATE HIRE LICENSING – A SOLUTION TO THE LACK OF NATIONAL STANDARDS?


Article by James Button James Button & Co., Solicitors www.jamesbutton.co.uk


For many years there has been a problem with cross-border activity by private hire vehicles. The problems stem from the fact that the licensing authority is often located many miles, in some cases several hundred miles, from the location in which the private hire vehicle and private hire driver are undertaking their booking and carrying passengers.


Whilst this activity is completely lawful (see “Remote private hire and hackney carriage activity” (2023) Journal of Licensing (JoL) 37 Page 8, available at: www.instituteoflicensing.org/resources/journal-of- licensing/) it causes difficulties.


Different local authorities have different standards for drivers, vehicles and operators which in some cases has led to a “race to the bottom” as applicants seek the authority with the lowest standards and/or licence


authorities feel compelled to


fees, and other reduce their


standards and/or fees to retain their own licensees. The “national standards” promised by


the


Government in 2019 (see: www.gov.uk/government/ publications/taxi-and-private-hire-vehicle-licens ing-government-response-to-independent-report) have yet to appear and the Government has stated that it will not happen this side of the next General Election. As the outcome of that election is unclear, the future for this commitment seems very uncertain.


In addition, there is the long-standing debate as to whether any such standards would be absolute standards or minimum standards. If they were to


24


be minimum standards, some authorities would have higher or different standards which would still lead to significant differences in the approach taken across the country.


Different standards put public safety at risk. It is absurd that a person who is considered not to be safe and suitable (fit and proper in the words of the legislation) to be a hackney carriage or private hire driver in one district can be found to be so in another and granted a licence.


Whilst the NR3S has gone some way to reducing such inconsistencies, they still exist and drivers who have been placed on the NR3S are still licensed by other authorities. Actions taken by local authorities following reports made under the Taxis and Private Hire Vehicles (Safeguarding and Road Safety) Act 2022 are variable.


Different requirements for vehicles make it difficult for private hire operators who are licensed by more than one authority to know what will be required or acceptable in different authorities.


There is much handwringing about cross-border activity, cross-border enforcement and the absence of national standards, but a distinct lack of action. It is clear that lobbying Central Government has not produced results (in 2020 it was announced that there would be no action taken to restrict cross-border activity – see Department for Transport email 21st July 2020), and whilst there are some cross-border authorisation arrangements between local authorities, it is by no means universal.


With no prospect of legislative change, what can be done? There is an answer and that lies with local authorities themselves.


An agreement could be reached whereby one Principal Authority is the licensing authority for


MAY 2024 PHTM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80