search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
KNOW YOUR RIGHTS


Get in touch urgently as you have a court hearing approaching which we will need to prepare for.


Q


Notice of Intended Prosecution issued 26/01/23 for speeding offence on 01/01/23, driving 42mph in 30mph limit. My husband was the driver.


Following receipt of NIP on 03/02/23 I viewed further details of the offence on South Yorkshire Police Public Access System. This states that there was a NIP issued on the 13/01/23 and a new driver was nominated on 24/01/23. This is before we even received the NIP!


Drink driving is under s.5(1)(a) Road Traffic Act 1988, whereas being drunk in charge is under s.5(1)(b).


If they maintain the ‘driving’ charge, it looks to be an easy win. We simply ask them to prove you were driving.


But I anticipate that as soon as you get into court it’ll be changed to an ‘in charge’ offence. The prosecution can lay a new charge without opposition up to six months after the offence date.


The second issue is private land. An offence of drink driving or being drunk in charge of a car can only be committed in a public place. I appreciate that this car park is private and has a barrier, but even with a barrier I would suggest that it would be a public place. Pedestrians can use the car park and if members of the public leave their cars overnight it would be difficult to argue otherwise. But we can certainly look into it.


However, regardless of the above you still do have a good defence available. It is a defence to being drunk in charge if you can show there is no likelihood of you driving whilst being above the limit.


So there are two things we need to prove:


1) No likelihood of you driving. This is different from intention. Whilst you may not have intended to drive your intentions may change when you wake up and so we need to show that there was no possibility of you driving.


2) That there was no likelihood of you driving whilst above the limit. So we have to show that the next time you would have been driving, the alcohol would have reduced. We might need an expert toxicologist report to back us up on that side.


PHTM MAY 2023


There is no further information to explain this discrepancy.


Given that the written NIP dated 26/01/23 wasn’t sent within 14 days of the offence is it invalid? if so, what are next steps to deal with this? I haven’t responded to the Notice yet. Thanks


A


When a speeding offence is committed a Notice of Intended Prosecution is sent to the registered keeper. In your case, I anticipate you weren’t the registered keeper?


It looks like the first NIP was issued on the 13th January to the registered keeper, and the registered keeper then nominated you as the driver. What you have received looks to be the second NIP.


In law, the NIP must be served either verbally at the roadside or at the registered keeper’s last known address within 14 days. So if they have sent it to the registered keeper within 14 days, then they’ve complied with their duty.


There is then an exception as well - a NIP is not needed in 14 days if the keeper has been the author of their own downfall, for example if they have moved but failed to update the V5 with the new address.


So if you are not the registered keeper, or if you are the registered keeper but the vehicle is still registered to an old address, then that might explain the delay. If so, it would not be challengeable on that basis. i


If you want regular updates on road traffic law follow us on facebook.com/PattersonLawMotoringSolicitors or twitter.com/Patterson_law_


67


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80