search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PROTEST PLIGHT..PROTEST PLIGHT..


CABBIES PROTEST CONTROVERSIAL BOURNEMOUTH CHRISTCHURCH AND POOLE COUNCIL POLICY PLANS


Controversial plans to lift a cap on the number of cab licences issued in Bournemouth and Poole have passed the final hurdle. The Bournemouth Echo reports that BCP Council approved new taxi policies on Tuesday 23 February, despite concerns about the effect they will have on the viability of the profession. An attempt had been made by some opposition councillors to delay the decision with calls for more information to be provided, but this was defeated. The policies, which were unanimously approved by the council’s licensing committee earlier that month, set out the requirements for taxi drivers operating across Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole. They include a new white colour scheme and a vehicle age limit. But the most controversial element is deregulation in Bournemouth and Poole. No such limit is in place in Christchurch. The council said this would open up the profession with the council having a waiting list of more than 300 people. The change is to be undertaken over five years with annual increases in numbers to ease the transition. However, taxi drivers have heavily criticised the move saying it will impact their livelihoods. On Saturday, 20 February, hundreds of cabbies, from all three boroughs, gathered in Bournemouth to protest. They then drove into the town centre in a convoy to highlight their opposition. “This decision will impact on the travelling public and on the livelihoods of the many taxi and private hire companies,” Kevin Diffey, the chairman of PRC Streamline Taxis said. “We are horrified at the proposals and frankly scared of the effect it will have on our companies.” And Paul Sondheim, the treasurer for Bournemouth Station Taxi Association, called on the council to defer the decision due to be made at its full council meeting. He said: “Our demonstration today is regarding the new Taxi and Private Hire Proposals which were decided at the Licensing Board’s meeting held on 4 February. Various petitions have been presented and speakers from the trade who attended that meeting were allotted just over five minutes a piece to voice their concerns over these new proposals.” Councillor Vikki Slade proposed the vote be postponed so more information could be provided but her suggestion was defeated in a vote. It was instead agreed to adopt the policies that had been approved by the licensing committee. Committee chairman Councillor Judy Butt, cited the example of one person who had been on the waiting list for a licence in Bournemouth since 1993. She said taxi drivers “understandably wanted to maintain the status quo” but said the restrictions were preventing people who wanted to move into the industry. Concerns had also been raised that the dress code could


62


discriminate against people wearing certain religious clothing but Cllr Butt said exceptions could be made in cer- tain circumstances. Having been approved for adoption, the new policies will come into force in April. The number of hackney carriage licences issued will now gradually be increased “with the clear aim of a total removal of limits” in 2025, the justifica- tion being that scrapping the cap would improve standards.


RESPONSES FROM THE TRADE NPHTA member: Kevin Diffey - Director, PRC Streamline Taxis


The Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole council hasvoted for congestion, increased air pollution and chaos in the Taxi service. The taxi trade was unable to take part in the consultation with the licensing committee directly as all the representa- tion went through the licensing officer who said that they would express our views at the meeting, which clearly did not happen. As a result, licensing staff have lost the respect of the taxi trade. They have deprived the plate owners of their investment in their taxi businesses, losing large sums from their pensions. There was no discussion about the three choices put before the committee which were: 1. to leave things as they are with three taxi zones 2. to regulate Christchurch to bring it in line with Bournemouth and Poole


3. to deregulate and loose the three zones. In the regulated areas there is a balanced number of taxis and private hire vehicles which ensures that there is except- ionally good service provision across the area, with the majority of Christchurch taxis working as private hires in Bournemouth and Poole. All this will change. The number of private hires will collapse as they convert to taxis. The


MARCH 2021


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96