search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
IN THE NEWS


BRADFORD PH BOSS FINED AFTER BLAMING SOFTWARE ISSUE FOR UNLICENSED DRIVER


The boss of a private hire company has been ordered to pay nearly £1,000 after claiming a computer glitch caused him to employ a driver without a valid PH licence. Imran Khan, 43, the operator of Aireside Private Hire, failed to attend his hearing at Bradford Magistrates Court on 22 May. The case was subsequently proven in his absence, revealing that one of his drivers, Khalid Bashir, continued working for several weeks after his licence had expired. The issue came to light late last year when Bradford


Council


officials blocked Mr Bashir's licence renewal after discovering an undeclared offence on his record. Imran Hussain, prosecuting for the council, explained: “While


checking as part of the renewal process, officers noticed an offence from January 2023 that had not been declared by Mr Bashir.” With the renewal halted, Mr Bashir was left without a licence, yet an investigation showed he kept working from Oct 7 to Nov 9. “An investigation found that Mr Bashir carried on operating as a private hire driver, even though he had no licence to do so,” Mr Hussain said. “That led to an investigation into the operator, who was asked to give reasons as to why they allowed a driver to work for them despite his licence having expired.”


When questioned by council


officers, Khan blamed technology for the oversight. Mr Hussain


stated: “He told officers that a mistake had occurred – at the time Aireside Private Hire was under- going a software update, and this was the reason the expired licence hadn’t been picked up.” However, the prosecution argued that Khan had already been explicitly warned about the upcoming expiration date. Mr Hussain told the court: “The defendant still knew and still had a responsibility to ensure the licence had been updated.” Magistrates found Khan guilty in his absence. He was fined £220, ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £88, and landed with the council's full legal costs of £600, bringing his total financial penalty to £908.


PHTM JUNE 2026


51


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76