search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
OP INION


Star treatment


What do hotel ratings really mean? And who decides them?


DEREK PIC O T A HOT E L IER FOR MORE THAN 30 YE AR S AND AUTHOR OF HOT EL RE S ERVATIONS


for recommended, and none for the others – a much clearer system than those of the more than 20 organisations that today attempt to classify properties worldwide. In North America there is the AAA Diamond rating, in the United Kingdom travellers have the Automobile Association or the national tourist boards. Most of continental Europe adopts the scheme by HOTREC (the Association of Hotels, Restaurants, and Cafés), though France, with Gallic desire for differentiation, favours the Hôtels de Tourisme award. At the start of the 20th century, the


L


Michelin Guide introduced star ratings to restaurants. By 1931 it increased the number awarded to a maximum of three per venue. Tis opened up a Pandora’s box, and star rankings turned into constellations. Over the decades, three-star ratings began to be used for pretty much everything; military ranks, films, books, theatre, even financial products. In France, at the start of


the 21st century, a hotel ranking system going up to five stars was introduced. In 2010 a sixth rating was created, the “Distinction Palace”, of which there are currently only 24 recipients. With just over half of them in Paris, the rest are mostly in the Alps or the Cote d’Azur and only one offshore – the Cheval Blanc in St Barts. Tis ranking is


bus ine s s tr a v el ler .c om


et’s start with John Murray’s “Handbooks for Travellers” which were, in 1836, the first publications to use a star rating for hotels. Murray used one star


given for those properties that display extensive facilities in spa and fitness, as well as visible steps in managing the environment.


AN EMPTY GESTURE? How can the traveller understand these rankings when the rules that the grading organisations apply vary so dramatically? And how relevant are they anyway? From my analysis, it seems that most organisations bestow stars based on the range of the facilities, with little recognition for service. In this way, a hotel without a liſt will rate lower than one with, despite the fact that the hotel may only be two storeys high. Tere is no regard for the service in the hotel without the liſt, which may well make it more attractive than its competitor. In Europe a growing number of branded


A hotel without a liſt will rate lower than one with, despite the fact the hotel may only be two storeys high


hotels do not even mention star level in their publicity. Is the Hilton Vienna the same grade as that in Paris? Hilton hopes you think so; both hotels are Hilton standard, international and apparently carefree of organised evaluation. Hilton’s only reference to ranking uses price and Tripadvisor’s “suns”; it believes those most qualified to grade hotels are customers. Moving eastward I enquired


how Jumeirah’s Burj Al Arab hotel had achieved its seven- star rating. I was told by its marketing department that it “seemed a good idea to add to their publicity when suggested by a journalist”. Not especially


helpful if it was just made up. Te only books that give a


proportionate amount of recognition to service as well as facilities are Forbes


Travel Guides. Te inspectors visit more than 50 countries, and are quite sniffy about which hotels they include. Tey have more than 900 criteria to evaluate, with an emphasis on service. A new theme among the systems appears to


be environmental impact, and there are several organisations promoting efforts to reduce this. Te Green Building Initiative, a US non-profit organisation, awards Green Globes based on sustainability, while the Green Key organisation champions an eco-classification. More systems are on the way. From the


Middle East is the Salam Standard. Tis evaluates how Islamic a property purports to be. Presumably there is little chance of a minibar, but you won’t get lost, as rooms will give an indication to the direction of Mecca. Who is allowed to give inspections and


award stars? As a rule, anyone, for while a small number of countries have a legal framework for this, most don’t. In Great Britain properties that do not wish to be inspected and ranked have no obligation to do so. Even where they have agreed to inspections, there is no requirement to display the ranking. If you want to be graded, you will likely be


charged. Te AA only rates hotels that pay to be members and can offer consultancy to help those hotels achieve higher standards. So there you have it. Te only promotion


to seven stars I know of has been either for a North Korean general or a hotel in Dubai and I’ve never seen a one-star property advertising itself as such. I lie. My Murray’s handbooks reveal Te


Cecil Hotel in Pall Mall, with the then- coveted one star. Good bachelor and family accommodation, fine cuisine and bed for my valet. Sadly, when I try to find it, I discover it was demolished by a bomb in World War II. BT


SEP T E M B ER 2 0 18 79


ILLUSTRATION: BENJAMIN SOUTHAN


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108