OP INION
Getting personal
Recent data breaches have highlighted the vulnerability of our information. But just who is pilfering our details?
DEREK PIC O T A HOT E L IER FOR MORE THAN 30 YE AR S AND AUTHOR OF HOT EL RE S ERVATIONS
I
n January there was a further update from Marriott International about its compromised Starwood guest database. Te press release declared a major intrusion into the system,
which affected more than 383 million travellers (down from 500 million). In its original statement in November last year, it identified that the information theſt started more than four years ago. Marriott now advises that the following
was possibly compromised: “Name, mailing address, phone number, email address, passport number, Starwood Preferred Guest account information, date of birth, gender, arrival and departure information, reservation date and communication preferences. For some, the information also includes payment card numbers and payment card expiration dates, but the card numbers were encrypted.”
DUTY OF CARE Before the Marriott press release, travellers were already reeling from a data breach at British Airways between July and August last year. I had the tiresome experience of having to change all of my passwords and request new bank cards. Significantly inconvenienced, I sought compensation from the airline. Aſter at least half a day’s aggravated angst, several mails, a couple of bank declarations and the cost of returning my payment card, I received a British Airways cheque for £3 in compensation, this being the only cost I could verify with a postage receipt. I had suggested an upgrade to my Executive Club status, but was told that this was impossible. All of this reminded me that businesses that request our personal data need to
bus ine s s tr a v el ler .c om
improve considerably the systems that are designed to protect it, and to compensate us properly when, because of their inadequacy, they prove unable to keep it secure. Reflecting on this
The National Cyber Security Centre stated that it defends the country from ten attacks a week
responsibility and the increased exposure our lives have on the web, I wondered how long it had been since not just individual hackers but organs of state had been looking through my details. Te UK’s National Cyber Security Centre, established two years ago, announced in its 2018 review that it defends the country from ten attacks a week. In the early nineties, when I was general
manager for a large hotel chain, I was approached by the British security services about an article they had read in a travel journal. Te piece that had caught their attention concerned ITT (which owned Sheraton at the time) promoting a new concept for its hotel division. Its great leap forward was to utilise the booking system to pass guest information across continents. In this way, any hotel in the chain would know all about client preferences ahead of a stay. What MI6 wanted to know was whether
the system could follow someone worldwide that they were specifically interested in. Could they trace where they were going? Would the system let them know where they stayed, what they bought and – most important of all – who they called? At the time, my level of computer literacy
was at about the same as a mountaineer’s knowledge of deep-sea diving, so I was unable
to answer the question instantly. Aſter they leſt, I made further enquiries to see if it was indeed possible to track individual guests around the globe. It became clear that, at
the hotel level, only certain preferences would be passed on with an advance reservation. But the
database held in the US had a wealth of information that was on the central system used for marketing and business performance measurement.
Today, we are in the strange situation
where we are all far more aware of how much of our personal data is out there, while at the same time frantically typing even more of it into our social media profiles every day, whether providing updates to Facebook, or simply using Google Maps to find out where our hotel is located while unlocking our phones with our fingerprints. No one knows who has stolen the
Marriott/Starwood data, but given that international corporations such as these hotel groups dutifully record travellers’ itemised spending, preferences, habits and personal data, it may be a government- sponsored entity. Something of this magnitude that has been going on for several years might indicate an organisation of scale. MI6 clearly had an inkling back in the nineties how important all of this data transfer was going to become and how the internet would open the doors wide to an anonymous invasion of our privacy. We are all now finding out just what that entails. BT
MAR CH 20 19 83
BENJAMIN SOUTHAN
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100
