library holdings.” – Maria Bustillos, The Brick House, Flaming Hydra; “While the tone and tenor of the book ban and discrimination campaigns will shift depending on the outcome, for many libraries and schools nothing substan- tive will change. Those political actors will continue to pursue their policy and social objectives because the technique of attacking libraries, education, and the public sector works for them.” – John Chtraska, Every Library.
Former President Donald Trump.
Equitable Access to Information and Privatisation
“After the upcoming US election, librar- ies may see a renewed focus on equitable access to information, driven by the leadership of the future Director of the IMLS and the Librarian of Congress. With public anticipation for increases in library funding legislation, there could be a significant investment in technology and community programs, enabling libraries to play a pivotal role in pro- moting civic engagement and literacy. This shift could ultimately maintain and enhance libraries as dynamic hubs of knowledge and innovation in their communities.” – Sam Helmick, Iowa City Public Library, current American Library Association President. “The fight will remain the same: to protect and expand public institutions, including the library. Politicians on both sides of the aisle have embraced the neoliberal privatisation of public goods for my entire life. A Trump presi- dency will embolden the worst elements of anti-public US society, making our work organising from the left much harder. But I’ll wake up Wednesday morning the way I always do, organis- ing with my community to expand ac- cess to library resources and services.” – Emily Drabinski, Former President of the American Library Association, Queens College.
“The rightward swing of the US courts has resulted in many decisions favouring corporate interests over the public good over the last 20 years; the September ruling of the appellate court against the Internet Archive is just one more. The composition of the 2025 US government in the executive and legis- lative branches will determine a great deal about the chance of gaining needed protections for digital ownership and against price gouging for ebooks and textbooks, as well as freedom from political interference in the matter of
October-November 2024
“After this upcoming election, many of us in US libraries expect more of the same - continued massacres in Gaza, committed by Israel and funded by our tax dollars, reactionary attacks on public institutions including libraries, press, and weather forecast offices, unprecedented climate disasters, increasing institutional censor- ship, and rampant mis and disinforma- tion. The only unknown is, ‘Will things get worse under a new administration?’.” – Alison Macrina, Library Freedom Project.
Mis and Dis-information “Unfortunately, it is unlikely that the elec- tion will halt the [misinformation] assault on libraries, which is so multi-dimensional (
https://tinyurl.com/IPNov24Elect) that no elected official has authority to end every attack. That said, where those winning their elections support the rights to read and to be free from censorship, they will populate the offices within their control with simi- lar-minded people, eliminating government support for those demonising libraries in their jurisdictions.” – Michelle Wu, Georgetown Law Library emeritus. “I have serious concerns in our state (Iowa), where we had a very high number of library adverse bills introduced last year, that we will see more of the same challenges to intellectual freedom, loss of local control, and potentially funding loss if the GPO maintains control of the legislature at a national and local level that will negatively impact our work and our communities. Those concerns go much deeper if Trump is elected. I believe our democracy is at an even higher risk if he takes office.” – Jennie Garner, North Liberty, Iowa. “Public libraries in the United States are largely locally funded and governed, so the short-term answer would be that nothing will change for them post-elec- tion. But the results of this election could well embolden or chill national groups such as Moms for Liberty that have become adept at shaping local library policies from a national level.” – Laura Crossett, Library Futures; “Trump’s presidential campaign win in 2016 opened the door for far-right extremists to usher in a new era of censorship and discrimination that put public, school, and academic libraries in the crosshairs. The resulting attacks on education – and notably on American children’s rights to free expression—have
Vice-President Kamala Harris.
intensified in the years since, with defunding efforts, annihilation of librarian and media specialist positions, school board takeovers, and violent threats to health and safety. In the short term, U.S. libraries should be prepared for increased scrutiny and threats, regardless of the election results.” – Michelle Reed, Library Futures.
Technology and the Rise of Vendors “At Re:Create, we’re focused on protecting fair use and the public domain, and for good or ill that hasn’t traditionally been a partisan issue. Libraries and their allies will be fighting to get the AI conversation focused on the public interest, including the benefits to research and education when fair use helps ensure AI technol- ogy is less biased and can be developed by folks who don’t have billion-dollar licensing budgets.” – Brandon Butler, Re:Create Coalition. “The past several years have demonstrated the vulnerabilities of relying on commercial technical platforms and “content” vendors who have neither obligation nor incentive to prioritise credibility, privacy, or accessibil- ity — values they can further neglect when empowered by corporate-friendly legisla- tors and courts. Librarians — as a national network, and in partnership with sympa- thetic allies, both domestic and global — will need to advocate for and contribute to the creation of resilient public interest resources and solidarity networks.” – Shannon Mattern, University of Pennsylvania, METRO Library Council.
“In a very concrete way, E-rate fund- ing (federal funding for school and library broadband] could be significantly impacted. A change in the balance of the commission in favour of the Republicans might mean that hotspot eligibility could be cancelled, removing support for a program that has the potential to pro- vide improved online access to countless Americans at a discounted rate.” – Ben Gocker, Newburgh Public Library. IP
INFORMATION PROFESSIONAL 39
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
