search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE KNOWLEDGE See


STONE KING at the French


Property Exhibition Stand 19


property. However, the DTA allows the tax paid in France to be off set against the inheritance tax paid in the UK in respect of Peter’s French home.


BETTER, BEST Which inheritance tax system is ‘better’? For most people, ‘better’ will mean less tax payable. Therefore, whether the French or British inheritance tax system is going to be better will depend on how much you own, how many children you have, whether you were married, widowed or divorced, and who you want to leave your assets to. In the above examples, we


have discussed Peter. Having been widowed, and with an estate of approximately £2m, three children and one stepchild, the British system will result in less inheritance tax being payable on Peter’s death. This is because the British system does not diff erentiate between stepchildren and children in the same way that the French system does. However, if Peter were


divorced instead of widowed at the time of his death (meaning that his estate could only use one tax-free allowance, £500,000 instead of £1m) and had four children and no stepchildren, the situation changes. Applying these facts, considerably more tax would be payable in the UK compared to France. While it is not possible to


His children will each receive the fi rst €100,000 free of tax and will pay tax on a sliding scale on the balance between 5%-20% (given the amount that they are inheriting). By contrast, his stepchild will inherit only the fi rst €1,594 free of tax and will pay inheritance tax at the fl at rate of 60% on the balance. If a person dies domiciled


in France, then the French revenue will seek to tax their worldwide assets on their death. The defi nition of ‘domicile’ in France is diff erent to that of the UK and is closer to that of habitual residence.


DOUBLE TAXATION It is possible to be domiciled in both the UK and in France, because of the diff ering defi nitions of ‘domicile’. Therefore, a double taxation agreement (DTA) exists which will confi rm, depending on the deceased person’s circumstances, which country gets to tax which assets. One country will be entitled


to tax the worldwide assets and the other country will, broadly speaking, only be allowed to tax the assets located within that country. For example, Peter’s


permanent home was in the


UK but at the time of his death he also owned a home in France. Under the terms of the DTA, the UK is entitled to assess his worldwide assets for inheritance tax, and France only his French property. Because of the value of his


properties, Peter’s benefi ciaries must pay inheritance tax in both the UK and in France on the value of the French


make an explicit choice of one tax regime over another, where your assets are located and where you are domiciled will make a diff erence as to which tax regime will apply following your death, and the amount of tax payable by your benefi ciaries or estate. ■


Charlotte Macdonald works on the international and cross- border team at Stone King LLP Tel: 01225 337599 international@stoneking.co.uk


MORE ONLINE


READ MORE ARTICLES ABOUT FRENCH LAW AT FRENCHENTREE.COM


FRENCH PROPERTY NEWS: January/February 2024 83


© SHUTTERSTOCK


©SHUTTERSTOCK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148