search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Continued from page 88


scanners are first-rate. They will mean significantly less pressure on the whole security area and massively speed up the flow of passengers. [But] we need whole terminals ready before the restrictions change.” In the meantime, the source


noted: “The messaging to passengers has not changed: ‘Be prepared to remove your liquids and electronic devices.’ Passengers will have to do that for quite some time even if their outbound airport has this facility. They need to be aware of the requirements at the other end of the route.” June will not be the first


deadline missed for relaxing the rules on liquids. The government previously told airports in August 2019 to install the equipment by 2022. This was delayed by the pandemic. As far back as 2011, the


Department for Transport confirmed “our intention that the restrictions on liquids will be lifted by 2013” in line with a European Commission ruling. But airports opposed that deadline, with the head of the Airport Operators Association at the time insisting: “The technology is not mature enough. There are too many false alarms. There are problems with flow rates [and] with different rules for different passengers.” Restrictions on liquids, gels


and aerosols in carry-on bags were introduced in August 2006 after UK authorities foiled a plot to blow up a US-bound aircraft using liquid explosives in cabin luggage. An initial ban subsequently gave way to passengers being permitted up to five 100ml quantities of liquids in a single plastic bag.


Etoa slams ‘opportunistic’ tax hike on Paris visitors


Ian Taylor


Etoa, the European Tourism Association, has hit out at a substantial hike in the overnight tax on accommodation in Paris, describing its imposition as “unprecedented”. An increase in the tax per person


per night of between €3.32 and almost €7, depending on hotel star-rating, was imposed from January 1 without warning. Etoa drew attention to the tax in


an update to members, noting the standard overnight accommodation tax in Paris (taxe de séjour) has increased by about 10% on 2023, with an inflation-linked rise expected. But the Paris regional transport authority, Île-de-France Mobilités (IDFM), was permitted to add a surcharge on the tax under a new legal provision only published on December 29. This raised the tax rates per


Visitors in five-star hotels must now pay €10.73 a night in tax


authorities as a matter of urgency.” The association told members:


“Unless the law is reversed, suspended pending review or a grace period is introduced, the tax is due if the stay begins in 2024, irrespective of the date the booking was made.” However, Etoa noted: “If


person per night from €3.75 to €10.73 in five-star accommodation, from €2.88 to €8.13 in four star and from €1.88 to €5.20 in three star. The tax is levied only on adults –


children under 18 are excluded – but the increase could still be hefty. Etoa slammed the increase,


saying: “The surcharge is an opportunistic raid on visitors to subsidise regional infrastructure and takes no account of the impact on operators and suppliers. The lack of notice is unprecedented. “We are engaging with local


full payment was made before the end of 2023 there may be a contractual basis to pay no more.” It added: “Cancellation aside,


the options are either to absorb the cost, pass on the cost to the client or require the end consumer to pay on the spot. B2B renegotiation is inevitable, with low-margin business particularly vulnerable.” The surcharge was enabled by a


national budget voted through by the French parliament on December 21 and published on December 29. The association noted: “Etoa had


no notice of this exceptional move and is grateful to members who brought the issue to our attention.”


Hospitality leaders outline obstacles to sustainability


A survey of hospitality business leaders has highlighted challenges to progress on sustainability and environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It identified the proliferation


of different reporting standards, stakeholder scepticism and lack of engagement, and concerns over the reaction of guests as barriers to


86 25 JANUARY 2024


progress and investment, as well as a lack of skills and knowledge in the industry and among its advisors. The survey of more than 250


hospitality leaders was conducted by King’s Business School in London and the Energy and Environment Alliance (EEA), a coalition of hospitality investors, developers, asset managers and operators. Three out of four respondents


(73%) identified reporting and benchmarking as a key issue. There was concern at the quality of ESG advice available and at conflicting priorities among stakeholders, with one respondent suggesting: “Most


Ufi Ibrahim


hospitality brands are focused on guest satisfaction, not sustainability.” EEA chief executive Ufi Ibrahim


said: “Leaders in the sector are clear that a common approach to tackling and reporting on ESG issues will be a major driver of change.”


travelweekly.co.uk


PICTURES: Shutterstock/Photocreo Michal Bednarek, aappp, Avigator Fortuner, Kollawat Somsri


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96