search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEWS 1


Which? accused travel firms of using ‘psychological tricks’ to tempt people to book


YOU NEED TO KNOW


What Which? found and firms’ responses


Which? monitored adverts with ‘book now’ urgency calls to action. It found that after each promotion ended, the same or a cheaper deal was available in 16 out of 30 instances. Which? said a Sandals deal


was £100 cheaper per person a week after a ‘mega-sale’. Sandals said the research


was “flawed”, and pricing was dependent on air and hotel rates provided to it, and exchange rates. “We have an open dialogue with the ASA and have yet to receive any queries with regards to how we conduct our sales,” said Sandals. Which? said a Kuoni deal


Which? slams travel firms for misleading sales deals


Lee Hayhurst lee.hayhurst@travelweekly.co.uk


Travel firms have been warned to expect closer scrutiny of sales deals following a Which? investigation.


As the turn-of-year peaks began, the consumer watchdog published a report accusing several travel firms of using “psychological tricks” to convince people to grab deals before they expired. But Which?’s probe last summer


found some prices fell immediately after the sales period, potentially in breach of the Committee of Advertising Practice’s code. Which? said it would continue


to monitor the sector and sent its findings to trading standards and the Advertising Standards Authority.


Steve Dunne, chief executive


of marketing consultancy Digital Drums, said: “Ten years ago, people would look at something once or twice. Today, they take the pulse of the market minute by minute. “I would always urge companies


to be as transparent as possible and if prices do fall, do a John Lewis and, within reason, offer to refund the difference if they find it cheaper.” Dunne said constantly changing


prices made it challenging for travel firms to meet customer expectations, but those that created unique deals would keep on the right side of the regulators. “Travel is going to find this particularly challenging because there are so many moving parts,” he said. “You have to make the offer perishable, so it won’t be available after a certain date.


4 travelweekly.co.uk 4 January 2018


“Be careful of layering phrases like ‘special offer’ on deals subject to fluctuating prices”


“I’d imagine Which? will look to


highlight this every year. It’s great publicity for them.” Stephen Mason, senior partner


at Travlaw, said yield management by suppliers meant agents had to be aware of the “toxic mix” of fluid pricing and fixed-price deals. “The industry needs to be


careful of layering phrases like ‘special offer’ or ‘sale’ on deals when product is subject to fluctuating prices,” he said. “Consumers are getting better


at understanding that today’s price may not be tomorrow’s, or


fell by £200 after a ‘book by’ deadline. The operator said it had reviewed processes, so prices were transparent, adding: “It’s never our intention to mislead customers.” Inghams blamed a website


error for twice extending the deadline for an Italy deal.


this morning’s may not be this afternoon’s. “But there’s still a minority who


fail to understand what everyone else does, or see some advantage in pretending not to understand. “The big issue is when something is actively misleading.” Mason said the issues Which?


highlighted were not widespread in travel but warned it was an offence to offer a time-limited deal if you do not believe the price will rise. Abta said “having accurate


information at the time of booking, including transparency of prices, is really important” and “is reflected in our code of conduct”. It added: “The number of complaints we receive each year about holiday pricing is very low, indicating that the majority of price advertising is trustworthy.”


PICTURE: SHUTTERSTOCK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88