search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
business Essential news, comment and analysis


Salou: Spanish hoteliers complain the costs of claims are rising


‘We can’t take our foot off the gas’ on bogus claims


TOUROPERATORS ARE TAKING A ‘MORE FORENSIC APPROACH’ TO SICKNESS CLAIMS. IAN TAYLOR REPORTS


Thomas Cook has a team of lawyers “forensically” reviewing holiday sickness claims as it seeks to drive down the number of fraudulent claims.


Rebecca White, Thomas Cook


senior legal counsel for litigation, said: “Thomas Cook’s experience reflects that of the entire industry. We saw a dramatic spike in gastric illness claims into last year. Abta data showed a significant surge.” White, who began working for Thomas Cook a year ago, said


80 travelweekly.co.uk 1 February 2018


industry efforts appear to be having an impact. She told a Hill Dickinson travel law seminar at the end of last year: “Levels [of claims] are going down and we take encouragement from that, but we’re cautious about it. We can’t afford to take our foot off the gas.” Abta launched a Stop Sickness


Scams consumer campaign last summer, with Travel Weekly promoting a Fight Fake Claims campaign in the industry. However, lawyers acting for


hotel insurers in Spain have claimed the costs of claims are rising as UK tour operators fight back (Travel Weekly, January 25). White revealed: “We forensically scrutinise every claim. “We have an inhouse team and


use external providers. If we think a claim is fraudulent, we won’t pay it. We would rather take our chances in court. “Ultimately, it comes to me and the Thomas Cook head of legal to decide whether we fight a claim or think it’s genuine. We’ll run a case if we don’t think it was the hotel and we don’t think the claimant can prove it was the hotel.”


CONTINUED ON PAGE 78


CLAIMS FIGHT


PICTURE: SHUTTERSTOCK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92