search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
27


It was therefore essential that, while Nissen Richards Studio updated the planning consent to a more ambitious scheme, they also “retained the approved building footprints and agricultural forms,” Richards explains. Their revised scheme was submitted and approved in November 2021, ahead of an extended period of pre-commencement work that included archaeology, ecology and environmental investigations. Planning consent included 25 conditions, of which 12 had to be discharged before works could commence, “covering archaeology, ecology, environmental matters and extensive ground investigations,” Richards says. “There was a considerable amount of work before construction could begin.” The existing consent had already


identifi ed which buildings should be retained and that the smaller, newer buildings should be demolished, which Nissen Richards Studio decided to leave unchanged. “We agreed with the approach because the larger barns were the buildings that gave the farmstead its identity,” Richards says.


“By selectively removing secondary lean-tos and ancillary buildings we were able to open up a generous central courtyard, improve circulation across the site and reveal long views into the


surrounding Wealden landscape,” he adds ometimes the most signifi cant architectural intervention is deciding what not to keep.”


Serving as both developer and main contractor meant Q New Homes had a “high level of control throughout the construction process.” As well as leading the architectural design, Nissen Richards Studio coordinated the consultant team including structural, landscape, environmental, ecology and whole-life carbon specialists.


The number of homes remained unchanged from the original consent, which had been established based on what could “comfortably” be accommodated within the AONB and Green Belt setting. Creating quality homes was always the ambition, rather than squeezing as many units on to the site as possible. “The generous spacing between buildings, the relationship between architecture and landscape and the character of the original farmstead were all fundamental to the success of the project,” says Richards. The homes range from three bedrooms up to six, with the largest approximately 6,500 ft2


. To avoid visual


repetition, each property is unique in the way it responds to its “inherited form, orientation and surrounding landscape,” explains Richards.


NISSEN RICHARDS DEVELOPED THE EXISTING CONSENTED SCHEME INTO A “MORE AMBITIOUS ARCHITECTURAL PROPOSAL”


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76